this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
40 points (91.7% liked)

Asklemmy

54292 readers
442 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Would it make a difference if the laws of physics prevent or allow a machine from operating in 'duplicate' mode?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

What do you mean by "your experience"?

There is nothing magic about this. I am what my brain does. My physical brain and its physical contents are cut and pasted.

Edit: "cut and pasted" is used here like with digital files, to avoid saying "copypasted" because I'm actively avoiding that can of worms of creating copies.

[โ€“] icanbrewmushrooms@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Again, you have no evidence for any of that.

[โ€“] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[โ€“] icanbrewmushrooms@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For claiming that you are what your brain does, and the (implied) correlation that another identical brain would therefore continue to manifest an identical experience. All of this is entirely conjectural, we have no evidence one way or another.

Your caveat that you must be cut and pasted and not copied doesn't help your argument, in fact it does the opposite, because it is not theoretically impossible that two identical versions of "you" could exist concurrently.

[โ€“] Lumidaub@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is afaik our current best guess at what consciousness is. If you don't accept that model as true at least for the moment, I don't know what we're talking about.

[โ€“] icanbrewmushrooms@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

We don't know what consciousness is, that's my point. It's called 'the hard problem of consciousness' for a reason, there is no consensus.

[โ€“] Lumidaub@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago

That's why I said current best guess. If we have no idea at all, this entire discussion is useless and OP should delete.