Asklemmy

54292 readers

442 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

Teleportation machines exist. Most people use them, and they come out the other side just fine. Would you use them? (mander.xyz)

submitted 4 days ago by SpicyAnt@mander.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

86 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Would it make a difference if the laws of physics prevent or allow a machine from operating in 'duplicate' mode?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For what?

[–] icanbrewmushrooms@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For claiming that you are what your brain does, and the (implied) correlation that another identical brain would therefore continue to manifest an identical experience. All of this is entirely conjectural, we have no evidence one way or another.

Your caveat that you must be cut and pasted and not copied doesn't help your argument, in fact it does the opposite, because it is not theoretically impossible that two identical versions of "you" could exist concurrently.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is afaik our current best guess at what consciousness is. If you don't accept that model as true at least for the moment, I don't know what we're talking about.

[–] icanbrewmushrooms@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

We don't know what consciousness is, that's my point. It's called 'the hard problem of consciousness' for a reason, there is no consensus.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago

That's why I said current best guess. If we have no idea at all, this entire discussion is useless and OP should delete.