this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
40 points (91.7% liked)

Asklemmy

54292 readers
497 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Would it make a difference if the laws of physics prevent or allow a machine from operating in 'duplicate' mode?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There's no difference. The universe could be destroying you and recreating you every Planck second, and it's indistinguishable from continuous existence.

[โ€“] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The problem with that line of thought is that even if it is true, it doesn't apply here, because when you create a perfect copy of yourself, you don't magically get a shared continuity where you experience the continuity of both the original and the copy. There would now be two independent chains of experience, and even if every chain of experience is endless destruction with continuity just being a trick of memory, there would still be two divergent continuities now, and one of those would end.

[โ€“] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

True but that's already happening in theory. All copies would argue they are the original even if their futures diverge. None would think otherwise or have an experience any different than our moment to moment continuity as it stands now. That's only apparent to a 3rd party.

[โ€“] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

From the perspective of a 3rd party, it's a technicality. From the perspective of the original continued consciousness, it's not.

[โ€“] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They would both have the exact same continued consciousness, that only diverges later. Only an outside party can tell there are 2 separate lineages.

[โ€“] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Except in the case of teleportation, one of them is stopped after the other has started. For ease of making my point clearer, lets say it takes a few seconds after teleportation to destroy the original.

For those few seconds, there would be two divergent consciousnesses. The original consciousness would not experience the consciousness stream of the copy. It would be left experiencing the inside of the teleporter, and then it would be extinguished. The copy would have access to the memories of the original consciousness, and would infact experience itself as a continuation of that consciousness stream, as would anyone and everyone that interacted with the copy.

But the original consciousness, the one that was copied, briefly existed simultaneously with its copy, yet distinct from it, before being extinguished.

Even if you believe that every moment of life is some version of that, where our experience of continued consciousness is not real, where we are "reconstituted" continuously as new versions, with only shared access to memory letting us perceive it as continuous, the teleporter still creates a second stream simultaneously with the first, before ending the first. You have a sense of self that is consistent and continuous. Even if you are recreated constantly, that is not how its experienced. You still fear death, injury, sickness etc, because you perceive those things as impacting you and your future experiences. You place value on your perceived continuation. And the teleporter breaks that, because there is no longer a perceived continuation for the original, only for the copy. And unless the act of copying spreads perceived consciousness across both streams simultaneously, one stream is going to experience its end.

[โ€“] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It's a fascinating thought experiment. We can know that's what actually happens, but I believe the teleported copy would not report it as such, and the destroyed copy does not know the difference to report its destruction. Even with multiple copies, I'd bet they would all report a continuous consciousness experience. If we take away the mysticism surrounding afterlife mythos, we're left with some pretty strange conclusions about what it means to exist, be conscious, and be an individual.

[โ€“] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

So confident about something we aren't even remotely close to understanding