139
submitted 1 year ago by SeaJ@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Yep, I am Hans, well foiled.

On page 3: "Despite the public speculation on these questions, in our view, there is no direct evidence that proves Hans cheated at the September 4, 2022 game with Magnus, or proves that he has cheated in other OTB games in the past."

(I missed that OTB means on the board).

But regardless, there is no concrete proof as you are suggesting, the report is speculation based on other player styles. As they say themselves, it's very difficult to know whether younger players may have learnt chess playing against AI and developed styles to match that.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But regardless, there is no concrete proof as you are suggesting, the report is speculation based on other player styles. As they say themselves, it's very difficult to know whether younger players may have learnt chess playing against AI and developed styles to match that.

This doesn't make it less ridiculous to claim the report contains no evidence of Hans cheating more frequently and more recently than he admitted. It's not definitive proof, but it's pretty darn likely. That's the neat thing about statistics: even if you can't prove a single case definitively, you can make likely inferences.

They state:

Consistent with the letter we sent Hans privately on September 8, 2022, we are prepared to show within this report that he, in fact, appears to have cheated against multiple opponents in Chess.com prize events (beyond the Titled Tuesday event that Hans admitted to having cheated in when he was 12), Speed Chess Championship Qualifiers, and the PRO Chess League. We also have evidence that he appears to have cheated in sets of rated games on Chess.com against highly-rated, well-known figures in the chess community, some of which he streamed online. These findings contradict Hans’ public statements.

I'm sure you'll understand that I trust chess.com a lot more than you.

[-] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

You said:

"Yes, after which it was proven that he cheated later than he admitted and more often than he admitted."

This is what I am disputing. It hasn't been proved.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If chess.com feels safe enough to use confident language, I do too.

[-] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

They aren't...

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
139 points (86.4% liked)

World News

39023 readers
779 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS