this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
383 points (97.3% liked)

Flippanarchy

2459 readers
797 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago (7 children)

So upper middle class professionals who live in fancy houses making 200k with lots of investments are just proletariat in this classification?

I feel like they have kinda different interests.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 days ago

They may think they do due to years of brainwashing and propaganda. But labor is labor at the end of the day.

Yeah, I fall in that category, and even though I own a tiny fraction of various companies, I don’t control the means of production. I sell my labor. The fact that I get paid more for it doesn’t change that, and to those that do control the means of production, I am just as disposable. That’s why I have to save and invest; to give myself a way to support my family when that happens.

[–] TRBoom@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Maybe bougie petites? The stock market is way more accessible now compared to Marx's time and by tying retirement to it (401Ks and similar) it really forces a lot of people to invest in the idea of capitalism.

[–] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

The term is labor aristocracy

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Honestly: yes.

There’s other classifications or sub-classifications particularly with regards to how much someone may benefit from capitalism and therefore where their interests might lie, but ultimately I think the bourgeoisie vs the proletariat is about how much influence they have over how society works.

Here’s another infographic which tries to cover that angle, no comment on how successful/ accurate it may be. Personally I think it divides people too much. (Source: Reddit, latestagecapitalism)

[–] pupupachu24@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

doctors, lawyers, tech bros, small business owners, drop shippers, celebrities: they are also petite-bourgeois.

[–] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes they are proletariat. In fact, there are a few billionaires that also fall into this group (I believe LeBron James). If you have to sell your labor, you are being exploited and a prole.

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

How do billionaires "have to" sell their labor?

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

In reality: they don’t.

In their minds: they fear losing that paycheck just like everyone else.

[–] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Billionaires that were labor originally still had to sell their labor at that time. I suspect some there may be some theory that argues that said billionaires are no longer working class when they cease working and are no longer dependent on their labor, but I am not sure how that'd differ from someone using their labor to get lucky in the stock market and retire early.

[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Pretty sure as soon as you don't have to sell your labor anymore to live a somewhat decent live*, you're not working class anymore, independent of how that happens. Working class background or something.

* That's a bit subjective of course, but at billionaires levels it's pretty clear

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That also makes them no longer working class.

There is a big difference between a retiree and someone that never had to work.

[–] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Which part makes them no longer working class?

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Not having to work for a living.

If you are a beggar you aren't working class either, but obviously there are important distinctions.