this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
73 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24410 readers
398 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

wonder if there's a wavelength of UV that will kill the pathogens but not feed the algae and you just tap some of the panels for some lights

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Was thinking the same thing, UV bulbs under the panels shining into the water on the way. although if it is getting treated down the line maybe it doesn't matter

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

it would probably be crazy inefficient to block out the sun then install sun bulbs under the shades. i'm sure we could come out with a deal to block only some of it out.

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

Maybe we can put a little sun under the sun blocker

[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago

not sun bulbs just some LEDs, full spectrum would defeat the purpose of preventing algal growth

[–] WagesOf@hexbear.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The fact that these things don't get shut down at night makes me feel like the UV from sunlight part is not part of making it safe.

[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago

there's probably environmental changes from having the stuff that UV kills not be killed even if it doesn't matter for the pre-consumption treatment.