this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
-9 points (36.4% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1833 readers
356 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Moderator on dbzero /Palestine believes pointing out that 80-90% of Jews worldwide are Zionists is antisemitic

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But for some reason when you point out the same thing for Jews, somehow that’s wishing death upon all Jews. In that case why wouldn’t the same go for Zionist Christians being in danger if someone pointed out how deep the Zionist movement is within the (especially Evangelical) church?

Saying something like "An estimated 80-90% of Jews in modern time are also Zionists" with stats to back it up is perfectly fine to say, but it's also worth acknowledging the fact that "10-20% of Jews are not Zionists".

What you seem to be arguing is that, because Jews are majority Zionist, we should treat every Jewish person as though they are Zionist. The problematic part is in bold:

80-90% of Jews in modern time are Zionists. Zionism is the accurately representative of modern Judaism. Especially religious Judaism where virtually every present day synagogue is Zionist.

This is simply conflating Zionism with being Jewish as though they are the same thing. While the majority of Jews may well be Zionists (I don't know whether the 80-90% figure is accurate or not, but let's assume for the sake of argument it is), it's still wrong imo to characterize all Jews as Zionists. Like another poster mentioned, there are still potentially millions of Jews who do not support Zionism, and/or who oppose Israel's genocide of the Palestinians.

But the question is: do these synagogues not accurately represent Judaism if the overwhelming majority of Synagogues and Jewish religious institutions are Zionist?

No, they don't - and you are making the same mistake again. Pro-Zionist Jewish synagogues cannot be said to represent Judaism as a whole, because not all Jews are Zionists, and not all Jews attend Temple. Why do you feel the need to stereotype all Jews, and all congregations as being the same? YDI.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Saying something like “An estimated 80-90% of Jews in modern time are also Zionists” with stats to back it up is perfectly fine to say, but it’s also worth acknowledging the fact that “10-20% of Jews are not Zionists”.

Yes that's literally done by saying not 100% of Jews are Zionists but 80 to 90%. It'd be great if it was more. In fact most (especially European) Jews used to oppose Zionism until Zionist Jews worked together with the Nazis to literally kill off non-Zionist Jews and force the rest of them to become Zionists.

And now we're in the present where the equation has massively changed. And we're not talking about 55 or 60%. We're talking overwhelming majority numbers. 80 to 90%.

To dismiss the beliefs of 12 million people because of a max 3 million people not sharing their view doesn't make any sense. Why would the views of the overwhelming majority of a group not accurately represent them, but a small minority do? If this argument was about anything else but the percentage of Jews being Zionist, this wouldn't even be a debate. It 90% of Christians supported Zionism then Zionist Christianity would be an accurate representation of Christianity.

it’s still wrong imo to characterize all Jews as Zionists. Like another poster mentioned, there are still potentially millions of Jews who do not support Zionism, and/or who oppose Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians.

Why do you feel the need to stereotype all Jews, and all congregations as being the same?

Why do you keep misrepresenting my argument which doesn't state that all Jews are Zionist but the majority are? Why is it "antisemitic" to simply correct this notion?

Because your argument is rooted in Liberal Zionism. I pick this battle because I actually support Palestine. Here's a much longer format explanation if you still don't get it after the articles.

Jewish Exceptionalism, Liberal Zionism, Jewish Supremacy - How YOU Inadvertently Support Israel

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because your argument is rooted in Liberal Zionism.

No, it's rooted in an understanding of how harmful majority stereotypes are. You completely ignored the bolded sentence which was the one I identified as antisemitic, and instead focused on the first sentence, which I agreed was fine.

80-90% of Jews in modern time are Zionists [FINE]. Zionism is the accurately representative of modern Judaism [ANTISEMITIC].

You could safely reword it to something like "The majority of Jews support Zionism". That would be accurate.

Otherwise it's no different from claiming something like "80% of gay men are promiscuous [made up statistic btw]" and then going on to state "Promiscuity is accurately representative of male homosexuality" as though it were true for every gay man.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OP’s black-and-white thinking* leads him in these directions sometimes. He keeps getting mentions on c/meanwhileongrad despite not being a “tankie,” since dialectical materialism is the furthest thing from dichotomous thinking.

*I don’t mean to psychologize; the wiki entry just happens to be categorized as such.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Agreed, and it's an all too common mistake that I'm sure we have all been guilty of at one time or another.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

And now we’re in the present where the equation has massively changed. And we’re not talking about 55 or 60%. We’re talking overwhelming majority numbers. 80 to 90%.

Then you believe collective punishment is correct and justified. Where have I heard that one before...