this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
74 points (95.1% liked)

Slop.

845 readers
492 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

individual slaughterhouse explosions don't really have an impact you have to get a group together and blow up enough slaughterhouses that they stop rebuilding them.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

"Hi, I really care about animal rights so I'm putting together a group to blow up some slaughterhouses! Oh but I'm not vegan, meat just tastes too good and it's too much effort there's no ethical consumption under capitalism anyway, amirite?" fedposting

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

i was riffing on the inefficacy of individual action, not fedposting

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I think you're missing the point.

Organizing a group around blowing up slaughterhouses would be inherently dangerous and would rely on establishing trust, and one way of determining whether you can trust someone in such a group would be to see if they are actually committed to the cause. If someone is willing to commit so far as doing adventurism, but isn't willing to commit to doing some safe, everyday thing, that's a fed. Or it's a 20-something with a deathwish. It's an enormous red flag.

Honestly it's such a ridiculous concept that it sounds like a bit.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

riffing is usually for comedy

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

"The Adventures of the Meat-Eating Chapter of the Animal Liberation Front"

  • A bunch of people sitting around a table discussing how disgusting and repulsive the conditions in slaughterhouses are and their plans to attack, while chowing down on filet mignon and being like, "Wow, that's actually really good, how'd you make this?"

  • Getting to the ranch and the farmer sees them and starts talking to them about how his wife went vegan and he's been conflicted and he's just unsure about making the leap, but they have no advice or resources to give so they just shoot him.

  • They finally succeed, all the factory farms in the country have been shut down and a communist utopia has been established, they go to the co-op looking for meat but they're all out because doing it ethically is less efficient. As they're walking along, dejected, they come across a closed down factory farm. "Are you thinking what I'm thinking?" "Maybe it's a good thing we didn't hit this place!"

I think it's hilarious.

[–] meatcringe@hexbear.net 3 points 10 hours ago
[–] meatcringe@hexbear.net 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Adventurism is ineffectual fedposting. Individual action is the atomic unit of collective action.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Individual action is the atomic unit of collective action.

no it isn't. you cannot add up individual actions and get a collective action. 10 people doing something each by themselves is fundamentally different than those same people doing it together as a group.

[–] meatcringe@hexbear.net 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

As collectives consist of individuals, so too do collective actions consist of individual actions. The group does the organizing but the members show up.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

if you cut it up it stops being a group. the atomic unit of collective action is at least two people, and it's different larger numbers depending on the action. you talking to your boss isn't collective bargaining no matter how many of your coworkers take turns.

once you do it together at the same time it becomes a collective.

[–] meatcringe@hexbear.net 1 points 11 hours ago

Do you share an identical subjectivity with your comrades? No. Each of you participates in mutual action.