this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
177 points (90.0% liked)

PC Gaming

14586 readers
939 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

FauxLiving, I appreciate your guarantees about the future, but can you demonstrate why the for-profit medical and AI industries wouldn't cut corners if the AI behaved the way you hope it will?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

First, this is a peer-reviewed result not me expressing my hopes.

Second, this application does not replace radiologists. It is a tool for radiologists in one specific type of diagnosis.

If you have some hypothetical future outcome in mind, then the burden of proof is on you to prove your position, not on me to disprove it.

The data shows that this system works.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago

FauxLiving, a paper isn't the same as you predicting the future. It does not show the system works. It is disgusting that you pretend to be an astrologer based on these opinions.