this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
225 points (98.3% liked)

Lefty Memes

7004 readers
301 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms


When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengists) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Art credit: Daniele Turturici

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stollen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

What if they are silent, lifted with vacuum levitation?

[–] Mok98@feddit.it 23 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Public transport would still be better

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Who's to say that's not what's happening in the image?

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The image itself says that by only having two people in the flying machine.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So you only understand public transportation if its packed like sardines?

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Sure. Fine. We do not know from context from this picture whether the flying machines being depicted are publicly or privately owned.

However, the fact that they are flying and hold so few people makes the distinction not really matter because of how incredibly inefficient they would be at moving people around.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Who's to say there are not larger vehicles available for larger families or groups. Seems more efficient to me to hand out transport that fits the party. Guess i don't see everything through capitalism tented glasses.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I’m saying it. It’s a still image and those aren’t there. They literally do not exist.

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Aww, so nothing else can exist if it's not depicted explicitly in this one image?

[–] carl_marks_1312@hexbear.net 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is the private mode of transportation. You need to source and mass assemble those flying cars for it to only transport 1-4 people. There exists a contradiction between this fact and a solar punk/environment friendly way of living, because you'd have to exploit a fuck ton of natural resources #traingang

[–] stollen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Trains are great, but some level of personal transport will always be necessary at least supplementarily (e.g. bikes, scooters). And we don't know how much natural resources would be used by flying vehicle construction, maybe there is a decent way to do it.

[–] CatoPosting@hexbear.net 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Physics exists, there is no economical way to fly.

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not an engineer, but if they are that light, wouldn't they be strongly affected by the wind?

Also they would still be crash hazard, so probably would be banned above human settlements and infrastructure, which doesn't leave a lot of places where they can traverse and take off / land.

A few years ago Adam Something made a video about flying cars - it was in the context of the currently available technology, but imho some of his concerns would still be valid.

[–] stollen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago

They would be light, but have a high mass, so not as jerky as a balloon.

I get that there are a lot of theoretical problems with flying cars, and current technology is sufficient for improving society if we just make different choices. I've seen Adam Something video, I just think we shouldn't stop dreaming about something that has inspired utopian visions for generations. It can be easy to grow sour on the entire idea of innovation after people like elongated muskrat use it to hype up their stock prices and fail to deliver. But innovation can be great, and better futures start by daydreaming.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Still uses 100x more energy than any ground based transportation.

[–] stollen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

No way, it keeps itself on the air with 0 energy expenditure, then moves with minimal resistance. Much more efficient than a land vehicle.