this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
137 points (97.9% liked)
Linux Gaming
25998 readers
159 users here now
Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.
This page can be subscribed to via RSS.
Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.
No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.
Resources
Help:
- ProtonDB
- Are We Anticheat Yet?
- r/linux_gaming FAQ
- Fork of an earlier version of the above
- PCGamingWiki
- LibreGameWiki
Launchers/Game Library Managers:
General:
Discord:
IRC:
Matrix:
Telegram:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This seems super bizarre in the face of bsnes. ZSNES as a name nowadays is basically nostalgia bait; base ZSNES – of the popular "big three" of bsnes, SNES-9X, and ZSNES – is the worst SNES emulator you can be using. Meanwhile, bsnes is fantastic (and even, for nostalgia pandering, has the falling snow as an option if that would break the bank).
"Who on Earth asked for this?", is my question. "Classic development style" in the case of ZSNES was shitty, highly inaccurate HLE that worked just well enough for popular titles. It's a honking heap of shit at this point that, in 99.99% of cases, you'd only use because you don't know better. I have no idea what this new version does that's remarkable enough to warrant its existence.
Users didn't flock to zsnes because it was the most accurate, they used it because it completely nailed the user interface for loading, saving, input, and configuration.
And because it was the first SNES emulator to play SNES games full-speed on a 486.
Things changed after 0.800. My Pentium PC struggled after the following release. IIRC it replaced some assembler code with C code that was less efficient.
It looks like 0.700 is actually when they switched to C.
https://zsnes-docs.sourceforge.net/html/history.htm
I believe it, though. SNES9X was coming into its own at about the same time period, and the inaccuracies were starting to catch up with ZSNES.
The inaccuracies made more demanding games work on my 133MHz PC, though.
Oh, absolutely. But other, more accurate, emulators started to take some of ZSNES's limelight away as hardware started to catch up to the demands.
It was a long time before a majority of PC owners could run BSNES at full-speed, but eventually it became one of the most well-beloved emulators. That same clock is what pushed ZSNES into obscurity over time.