this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
844 points (99.6% liked)

Fuck AI

7037 readers
849 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jumperalex@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

For those asking / pronouncing this has to be a joke, perhaps. But not for long. AI is still not making a profit. So whatever it costs today at the growth-at-all-costs subsidized rate, think how much more expensive it will be when investors start insisting on profit after market consolidation*.

Because if you think there is a competitive barrier to entry for smartphones, operating systems, CPUs, and streaming services, you ain't seen NOTHING yet

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They're spending $3 per $1 of revenue. The price per token will rise dramatically.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I suspect it's even worse than that.

A Claude Max subscription is $200 a month, which is roughly $7 a day. I'm forced to use Claude Code at work, and I frequently run the /usage command out of morbid curiosity to see how many tokens in wasting. I'm not exactly a power user, but even with my bare-minimum usage I typically burn about $50 of tokens per day — so roughly 7 times that $7 a day figure.

And that's just based on Anthropic's official per-token pricing, which itself is almost certainly subsidized... so it's likely I'm costing them something closer to $20-$30 for every $1 of revenue. And again, I'm only using it for the bare minimum. I know people with much higher usage than me.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Similar boat, lots of people on the loss-leading phase, 'the first hit is free/cheap' is in play and I know development organizations that are explicitly designing hard dependencies on hosted AI as the 'foundation' of their processes. They are going for mainframe-style lockin where customers are too scared to change when it gets too expensive.

I know one organization that at least is being more careful, their LLM usage is only based on whatever they can run indefinitely on-premise without sweating future traps around pricing changes.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. I would prefer to work at an organization that uses no AI at all, but at the very least companies should be moving to on-prem local models so that they don't suddenly get rug-pulled the moment the investment cash runs out and AI firms are forced to raise prices or die.

I've been yelling this at my own org for months, but no one cares.

Move fast and break things, even if the thing you're breaking is your own fucking business...

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

We also have that energy shortage problem right now.