this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
109 points (99.1% liked)

HistoryPhotos

1430 readers
163 users here now

HistoryPhotos is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  4. No genocide or atrocity denialism.
  5. Photos MUST be at LEAST 10 years old, and ideally over 20. We appreciate that we are living through events which will become history, but this is ultimately not a comm for news or current affairs, but events which have occurred some time in the past.

Related Communities:

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 22 points 6 days ago (3 children)

wiki/La_Jamais_Contente

The vehicle had two Postel-Vinay 25 kW motors, each driving the rear axle via a chain, running at 200 V and drawing 124 A each, for about 68 hp total, and was equipped with Michelin tires.

The benchmark to beat was this at 92.69 km/h:

The 1899 Jeantaud Duc Profilée was powered by a 26.8 kW (35.9 hp) electric engine. The car weighed around 1,400 kg (3,100 lb) and transmitted its power to the rear wheels through a chain-drive gearbox. The Profilée was designed to be more aerodynamic than its older brother, featuring pointed ends on both the front and back, which allowed it to break the record top speed of 79 km/h (49 mph) of its less aerodynamic rival the GCA Dogcart on 4 March 1899, achieving a speed of 92 km/h (57 mph).

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's awesome. Also shows how much oil companies have hindered the development of electric vehicles. Every other tech has 100x in 125 years, electric vehicles only became somewhat mainstream in the last 10-15?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago

Batteries have limited the development of electric vehicles. The only reason why battery research existed was consumer electronics. As for the motors, they really have not changed much in 125 years because they are already very efficient.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I wish one of the pages would list how that weight is distributed along the different parts. I would wager half of that weight, 700kg, was the battery, with the electric engine being ~250kg.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

250 for the engine is way too much.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

That's due to the materials, cooling, & intended (decades of continuous, low-vibration, & safe industrial?) use - the one you linked has a cast iron frame, which is prob the majority of those 200kg.

Here is a random example (bcs there is a table included with power & weight) under 100kg that looks about the same: globalsources.com/permanent-magnet-motor_1210699575f.htm.

But I def don't know anything about electric motors 120 years ago, what was available, how the rich kids did their hobbies, etc.
And I do agree that the 250 estimate might not be too much - ~~however that means that the car was unbalanced af & the driver had to sit on the opposite side of the (initially one) electric motor to provide counterbalance (instead of the motor just being mounted in the centre of the car)~~ nvm, it had two.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Only 2 of 5 of your media load for me 😢

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)
[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

Reload does nothing