this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
94 points (98.0% liked)
Slop.
851 readers
557 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments




That's why you need to have some kind of objective measure of the labor being performed. Marxian Ecology would likely not consider the dialectical relationship between pollinator and things which need pollinating unless the labor is being used for an extractive process that moves nutrients from one locality to another (from the rural to the urban). If the collection of honey is done in a way that doesn't disturb the metabolism of the region then it would (to my extremely lay-person understanding of Marxian Ecology) not be exploitive in the same sense since what is extracted is then returned to the land it was extracted from.
Obviously the calculation is different when were talking about raising and eating animals as part of the reproduction of labor.
Maybe someday we'll be able to talk to the bees and work out a deal
gotta learn the right dance moves and odors