this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
130 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15991 readers
2 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 69 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Remember the time Spartacus led a paid worker rebellion

[–] Barabas@hexbear.net 46 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You gotta hand it to em, it sure doesn't sound like communism to me.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 40 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What's really hilarious is the fact elite Romans despised the primitive capitalists amongst their midst, it's almost like Roman society was defined by landed nobles who relied on slave labor to generate accumulation for the sake of status and luxury and not capital gains through the exploitation of a working class for the sake of reinvestment in productive assets

The debased money grubber was an archetype in Roman literature, and yet these dipshits still think Roman society was defined by capitalism lmao

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah. Publicani, usually cited as example of protocapitalist ventures, were bashed even by the people from aristocracy doing exactly the same thing, but personally by the office instead of equites forming an company.

Wait a second, is that some of the dreaded example of “The history of all hitherto existing human society is the history of class struggles.”? Oh oh no, we need immediately derail the line of thoughts into some romaboo nitpicking of legionnary armour details!

[–] JeffBozo@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Heh, Romans owned houses, paid wages (of course a cracker like me aren't going to mention the slaves), and traded goods. CAPITALISM!!!

Why is it that libs never know what capitalism is? And could this pretentious asshat be more reductive than this? All it takes to disregard Roman society as either capitalist or communist (who would even claim that it was communist lol) is to look at the class structure of the Roman society.

And gosh, calling yourself Publius like you're some expert on the Roman empire and then acting smug and dumb as a bag of rocks means it's definitely a white right-winger.

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago

A block, a stone, a worse than senseless thing. This man has forgotten great Pompey.

To be fair to poor Publius, state of his nose suggest severe longtime overdose of something nasty.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 years ago

Nah they got around that by calling them slaves.

Then again the soldiers didn't exactly always get paid so really they weren't known for paying workers