Technology

42948 readers

174 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

-12

Hands-on with ChatGPT's powerful new image engine (www.axios.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In the day that I have had access, I gave the new model a wide range of tasks.

A friend asked me to make a memorial image of her recently deceased cat along with two favorite toys. It crafted an image that looked like a highly personalized sympathy card.

It elegantly took two photos from my wedding and made it appear as if they were in an old-style photo album with photo corners.

My colleagues suggested a poster for a fictional event. I decided to create a Mike Allen look-alike contest in Washington Square Park this Sunday. (Of course, it's only fictional if no one shows up.)

It also made a handy infographic making "the case against candy corn" which I used unsuccessfully to convince two colleagues that the treat, which is neither candy nor corn, is also not good.

The full pages it designs are scary good. I'd go so far as to say this is definitely a shot across the bow for design work.

If you're used to absurd lettering and poor design decisions, the output included in the story suggests otherwise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

OK. What are the clues?

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Mostly the art and the fonts if I had to guess? It was more of an uncanny valley visceral reaction though.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've been out of the design game for six years at this point. Given that I did broadsheet design and wince at most everything for both art and typographical choices, it wasn't really the sort of thing that stood out to me. There is a lot of bad design being happily gobbled up ... hell, I didn't look at rave flyers in the '90s and think "this is great design," but rather "how the hell did they have the budget for C2S in CMYK with spot fluorescent and a top coat?"

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I didn’t say it was bad, per-say, I don’t know enough about design to judge that, it just immediately triggered the “this is ai” bell in my head when I looked at it.

[–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Your bell was primed because they told you it was AI in advance. That why mentioned AB testing. If you saw these, side by side with other human made posters and flyers, how reliable would your bell be then? We don't know.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Would it have if you'd not been told it was ahead of time, though?

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

I think so based on how much it stuck out at me but I can’t know for sure obviously