this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
107 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
851 readers
463 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wait French Guiana is an advanced economy?
Colonized by the French, so they get an honorable mention.
The one that still has me stumped is Greenland isn’t colored in, but Denmark is?
Besides forgetting it exists, Greenland is mostly a native populace as opposed to the "approved" European.
I suppose it does have Mayotte beat on that metric.
It was a good comment IMO and I think the high native population is a major factor, sorry if my reply led you to delete it - that wasn’t my intent
Sorry, thank you for that clarification, I really do appreciate it.
French overseas territories are officially France, Greenland is not officially Denmark. You can differentiate Greenland from Denmark and you will hear no one complaining (Well, nobody worth listening to).
What goes where is bullshit, but Greenland being their own thing is not.
Greenland is just a big, poorly run, piece of ice
I'm guessing this is mostly underlying data hijinks because Greenland is an autonomous territory of sorts and French Guyana is just straight up france. I mean latter is part of the EU and uses the Euro.
What I wanna know is whats going on in Svalbard... a national park economy?
edit: ooh they have a Lenin statue, ok svalbard edit2: correction, they have multiple Lenin statues