this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
257 points (98.9% liked)

movies

3460 readers
225 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iamericandre@lemmy.world 97 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Should be The Quest for More Money

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 48 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've been saying for years it should be Spaceballs 3: The Search for Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That was the only acceptable title. How did they screw that up? Makes me have even less hope for the movie.

[–] Butiki@mander.xyz 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm okay with this, since Mel Brooks already found the money! Turns out, it was in his basement all along!

[–] Dunstabzugshaubitze@feddit.org 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

"The Quest for more Money" happened offscreen and the heros should complain that such an important event was only communicated through some obscure Event in a totally unrelated medium after being flabbergasted that Money for a Mission was somehow found.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

“Wait, what about the money? Aren’t we supposed to be on a search for money?”

“They found the money. Didn’t you watch the title announcement video?”

“The what?”

“Was that on Fortnite?”

“Fortnite? What kind of a stupid idea is that? It was on YouTube!”

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

"Somehow, the money returned."

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The other good alternative Rick Moranis suggested would have been

Spaceballs III: The Search for Spaceballs II

This is one of the few sequels im very okay with having.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

As Mel states in the video, he found the money.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That would be wasting their title to repeat a joke they already told 40 years ago. Instead they went with something timely, poking fun at requels that don’t differentiate themselves from the original.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

requels

Requels suck. We already quelled enough the first time! :)

[–] Dunstabzugshaubitze@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

if they repeat a joke i hope its Yoghurt presenting a flamethrower as "the thing you used to love as a kid"

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Best joke in the original was the virgin alarm. I could see them pulling off a callback to that.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

While that was hilarious, I must humbly - yet strongly - disagree.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGvblGCD7qM - 1m40s in when Dark Helmet throws the mic away does it for me. But my favorite joke - not the best, but my favorite - because I didn't catch it the first hundred times I saw - is also in this clip at 2m20s where Dark Helmet taps Colonel Sandurz on the chest - who looks at the hand, the camera, realizes it's coming in, and backs out of the shot. That's just.... oh man, that is like the pinnacle of the detailed thought that went into a very very silly movie.

So many movies just throw actors out there and get them to improv, and that can be great. But the sheer density of hilarity in Spaceballs, Blazing Saddles, Young Frankenstien and others… it's just a beautiful thing. When it feels like 75% of the movie is quotable. lol

So I don't disagree that the Virgin Alarm was great, but I think the above clip is ten times better. But you're allowed to reverse that rating for you, of course. Long as you and I love the movie, I'm satisfied. :)

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You got me... the camera zoom reaction is a better joke. But maybe not as good a candidate for a callback!

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

To be brutally honest though, I didn't so much want to disagree as really to just post that clip and talk about it. LOL

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lol, more like they went with something boring and completely unimaginative. The quest for more money is a fun throwback for a movie that only exists because it's a throwback.

Like seriously. They aren't making some new IP here. It's a shameless money grab and it would be 1000x funnier if they owned it, it isn't high art my dude

[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

Right?!

The failure to grab this 40 year old payoff makes me nervous about the new movie

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Maybe that is the third one. Or it's too on the nose.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It is a joke from the first movie that the sequel would be named The Quest for More Money. This minute long video explains why they used The New One instead.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago

And it would've been even funnier because this movie is a blatant money grab

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 5 points 2 weeks ago

Spaceballs 3: The Search for the Lost Sequel

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 1 points 2 weeks ago

The Soich Fuh Moar Moneh!

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 3 points 2 weeks ago

The search for more money!