62
Peers vote to ban pornography depicting sex acts between stepfamily members
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
62 points (100.0% liked)
news
24718 readers
572 users here now
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
there's some pretty bad incest but its kind of a touchy subject politically bcs its basically exclusively pakistani immigrants who do it on a large scale
I never knew the Windsors were from Pakistan
Cousin marriage is bad whether its the Windsors or pakistanis or east anglians doing it and i never said otherwise
Thats cousins and not step family. I'm not endorsing it, but it is an entirely different issue.
There's just as much, if not more, coercion around arranged cousin marriages than there is in step-sibling intercourse and far more risk to any kids. We all understand that smoking and drinking while pregnant is child abuse, why shouldn't cousin marriage be considered the same way?
Thankfully it's been decreasing in recent years thanks to government initiatives that were rolled out a decade or two ago to cut down on teen pregnancy and incest in the uk https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67422918.
I understand the reason for banning cousin marriages, and I do not endorse cousin marriages.
However if your reason is solely that they carry an increased risk risk of genetic disorders in resulting offspring, then I'm sorry I have simply read too many medical textbooks to accept that argument blindly. Should we ban anyone who is a carrier of a genetic disorder from having children? What about anyone with a genetic marker for a disorder? What about geriatric pregnancies, are women who get pregnant at 40 child abusers? What if someone has a robertsonian translocation in their germline, are we gonna sterilise those people?
Cousin marriage isn't great, real incest is bad, neither one justifies or is really related to portrayals of step sisters getting stuck in dryers.
i dont think banning it outright is an answer, but i think it should be absolutely be discouraged as much as possible, we do need to draw some kind of a line between acceptable and unnacceptable sacrifices for the sake of kids wellbeing and the general health of society. Not smoking and drinking for 9 months is an acceptable sacrifice for a kids health, encouraging people through education and social programs to marry one of the millions of people in the uk who isn't a first cousin is an acceptable sacrifice imo, but strapping an armband on someone with a genetic condition and sterilising them obviously isnt an acceptable sacrifice.
The UKs been consistently rolling out programs to discourage young brits becoming pregnant and its been immensely succesful (see spoilered graph)