196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
view the rest of the comments
I unfortunately didn't understand this post. What edits are being made to this picture?
This is preemptive, sort of.
There's been an ongoing edit war going on over the captions of the picture which is a spillover from the page for Guy Standing which features a picture of Standing sitting since there are no pictures of Guy Standing standing. The obvious joke was made almost immediately, which was reverted almost immediately. Normally this is where things would have stayed, but the joke about Guy sitting became a sort of political issue as I described in this post. Wikipedia has been trying to be more serious for a while now, and stuff similar to the Cetaceon Needed joke is not being allowed to stay even though they don't violate the rules of the site.
When the Guy Standing caption was fully lost ground due to ruling by the admin team, the edit/reversion war moved to the page for Sir Guy Standing, starting with a picture of Sir Standing sitting in center-frame with his daughter behind him (necessitating the clarification that Standing is sitting). This picture makes the clarification less relevant and is therefore more vulnerable to being relabeled as Standing (left).
I would have not learned about Prof. Standing's theory on the precariat class if it wasn't for this joke. I also would not have learned about Sir Standing's film career if it wasn't for this joke. Removing the frankly nondisruptive jokes about how Standing is sitting, in the opinion of myself and many others, harms the educational mission of Wikipedia.
You should've opened with the fact that the original person in this story is a pro labour economist named "Guy Standing" who's name was memed on by Wikipedia captions. I got almost none of that context from your post or comment, and wouldn't have bothered figuring out what you were talking about if I wasn't a mod here.