this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
322 points (99.7% liked)

politics

29757 readers
1852 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The two-week temporary ceasefire has done little to quell GOP fears about the war in Iran costing the party seats in November.

Republicans are relieved over Trump’s steps toward reconciliation in Iran — but they worry the measures are too little, too late to save them from a brutal midterm election cycle.

Behind the public celebration by many Republicans of the temporary two-week ceasefire announcement, longtime party operatives continue to warn of a bleak political reality as the cost-of-living concerns around the war including spiking gas prices that are likely to continue for weeks if not longer even if the fragile ceasefire holds.

A person close to the White House, granted anonymity to speak candidly, put it bluntly.

“This war in Iran almost cements the fact that we lose the midterms in November — the Senate and House,” the person said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 139 points 1 month ago (34 children)

If democrats ran on a hard stance of "We will prosecute the fuck out of everyone involved in the current administration", they'd sweep the midterms. Then if they actually followed through on it, they'd also sweep in 2028, but we all know they won't do either.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If they ran on that, I wouldn't be surprised if the regime arrested them for sedition and thus proved their point even more.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not like they can do that overnight.

Also, don't pretend that the Democrats oppose this war on moral grounds. The only criticisms most national Democrats have been able to muster are either that the trump admin has failed to follow appropriate procedure (not informing Congress, which is a whole tangent alone), or that they are incompetent in their execution of the war, which...

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 10 points 1 month ago

The Democrats are happier than pigs in shit right now. They get to have their war for their precious fucking Israel while being able to avoid blame for the war.

[–] Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yep. Democrats are pretty right wing

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, don’t pretend that the Democrats oppose this war on moral grounds.

They generally oppose it on economic grounds at least. I'll take the outcome of "no war" even if I disagree with the reason we get there.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're not wrong, I do think that falls under criticism of the execution more than anything, and even the likes of schumer are at least verbally pushing for legislation to force it to end. If that comes around, well, better late than never.

I still doubt the Democrats willingness to engage in any policymaking that would actually make it difficult for the executive to engage in wards like this in the future

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 7 points 1 month ago

Trump is already trying to cheat and misuse the DoJ all he can. It is not like going easy on these criminals will save Democrats.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"We will do everything in our power to make sure that the rule of law is upheld and justice is done."

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Even that would get them retaliated against -- just look at Senator Mark Kelly.

Not saying they shouldn't do it anyway; just highlighting how absolutely evil the regime actually is.

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I don't have much faith in the Democrats. I'm reading Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States. It's a great book, and everyone should give it a read. It basically sums up the entire history of America from a Liberal law professor's point of view.

... regardless. In terms of taxes, Democrats are largely responsible for increasing taxes on the poor and subsidizing the rich. They at the same time give weak concessions to the lower class, but these are flimsy enough to be overturned the minute Republicans are in charge.

He summed it up in one sentence:

In a two-party system, if both parties ignore public opinion, there is no place voters can turn.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

In a two-party system, if both parties ignore public opinion, there is no place voters can turn.

Yup. Combined with a few other things (e.g. gerrymandering, electoral "college", citizens united) and our election system is basically a fucking scam.

That is not to say that you should sit on the sidelines during the election, just understand that the game is rigged.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I like Zinn, but a lot has happened in the 46 years since publication (23 since last updated). Book remains a must read, but you have to remember that.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If Democrats were capable of that sort of backbone, Donald Trump would never have become president. At least, not for a second term.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ah yes, the classic blame Democrats for Trump. Because Trump voters don't have agency.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You’re missing the big picture and blaming the right when the problem isn’t right OR left. It’s UP. As in, the rich. Notice how neither side’s elected representatives really seem to give a shit about you?

[–] PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Notice how neither side’s elected representatives really seem to give a shit about you?

THIS!!! Yet, Lemmys keep on mistakenly thinking that the Dem's have their backs. lol

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Correct: We blame democrats for ignoring their own constituents and embracing the status quo and therefore being able to lose to a stupid dipshit like Trump. The truth hurts, sometimes.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

bUt MuH dEcOrUm

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Democrats

Taking a hard stance

Pick ONE.

load more comments (29 replies)