Apple

20403 readers

90 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:

No NSFW Content
No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

MichelleG@lemmy.world

thisisdee@lemmy.world

RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world

Apple is Reportedly Facing a 'Massive Dilemma' With the MacBook Neo (www.macrumors.com)

submitted 1 day ago by sundray@lemmus.org to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In the iPhone 16 Pro models, the A18 Pro chip has a 6-core GPU. During the chip manufacturing process, however, sometimes a CPU or GPU core can turn out to be faulty. Rather than discarding the leftover A18 Pro chips with only a 5-core GPU, Apple opted to use them in the MacBook Neo, as a way of optimizing its supply chain and costs.

These so-called "binned" chips with a 5-core GPU are effectively "free" to Apple, given that they otherwise would have been discarded.

Herein lies the dilemma.

In the latest edition of his Culpium newsletter today, Culpan said the MacBook Neo is selling so well that Apple's supply of the binned A18 Pro chips with a 5-core GPU will "run out" before the company is able to fully satisfy demand for the laptop.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Binning has been a thing forever. Apple isn't new in selling processors that are technically nerfed versions of better ones. It's not shady either -- the chips were binned exactly because they were tested.

What I find more interesting is that Apple is also dealing with what happened on the PC side a while ago: processors get so fast that the differences between mid-range and high-end don't really show up in typical day-to-day workflows. Apple is right to think that this gives them a chance to gain market share by selling a Mac which is significantly cheaper, but to what effect? Apple hardware has been the expensive option for a long time, and one could argue that a lot of brand identity is tied up in high prices, because people perceive "most expensive" as "the best". I can't think of a brand on the PC side which has been happy to stay at the top of the price range for so long.

So a cheap Mac is decidedly off-brand for Apple. Will people spend thousands extra for a machine that feels mostly the same for everyday workloads?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Neo is the gateway drug into the ecosystem. For people who have only ever known Windows, MacOS will probably blow a lot of minds with how superior it is. Then Apple has a new customer who will want everything Apple from now on. Maybe not every time, but I would wager the majority of times, they’ll have new converts.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

This used to be the logic behind the iPod. In fact, it was referred to as the "iPod halo effect". So I would not be surprised if that is a key reason for the pricing.

[–] kmck@mas.to 1 points 1 day ago

@circuitfarmer It’s also a good time to go back to selling Macs with only 8 gb of ram, given supply constraints. Can’t really walk back the minimum amount of ram in an existing line (although they have reduced the maximum at least in the case of the Studio, which is bad enough)