this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
58 points (96.8% liked)

Apple

20403 readers
95 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the iPhone 16 Pro models, the A18 Pro chip has a 6-core GPU. During the chip manufacturing process, however, sometimes a CPU or GPU core can turn out to be faulty. Rather than discarding the leftover A18 Pro chips with only a 5-core GPU, Apple opted to use them in the MacBook Neo, as a way of optimizing its supply chain and costs.

These so-called "binned" chips with a 5-core GPU are effectively "free" to Apple, given that they otherwise would have been discarded.

Herein lies the dilemma.

In the latest edition of his Culpium newsletter today, Culpan said the MacBook Neo is selling so well that Apple's supply of the binned A18 Pro chips with a 5-core GPU will "run out" before the company is able to fully satisfy demand for the laptop.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

[If they made new chips] Apple would have to disable a GPU core on these chips to ensure that they have only a 5-core GPU, like all other MacBook Neo units sold to date.

I’m sure some choice individuals could get those extra GPUs to work if it came to that.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, it seems petty to punish people for not being among the first to buy the Neo. That extra GPU core would not be a selling point. The fact that the MacBook Neo, with its binned A18 Pro, can play Cyberpunk, but my iPhone 16 Pro Max, with a regular A18 Pro, cannot, is already an advantage over my phone which cost over twice as much.

It's worth noting at this point that phones not having AAA games is down to developers. Any game on the Switch 1 can run on your iPhone if your iPhone gets major updates. Any game on the Switch 2 can run on newer iPhones. Because those games were coded for ARM64. The only reason we don't have Skyrim on the iPhone is because Bethesda hasn't put it in the App Store. They already did the work. But they decided people wouldn't pay $60 for a phone game. So they transitioned it into a free-to-play piece of shit called The Elder Scrolls: Blades and nobody liked it. They can let Skyrim go on sale for $10-20 on Steam and the Switch store, but they can't swallow their pride and drop it on the App Store for $20? The game is 15 years old. But they've already done the work. This idea that you need an Xbox, a PlayStation, or a "gaming PC" to play AAA games is a farce. Even if you have a recent Android phone, you have the necessary performance. Phones running both platforms have had desktop performance for years now.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

While it might be petty, disabling cores isn’t punishing the second wave of buyers. It’s making the second wave match the first it terms of specs.