this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
310 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

6703 readers
119 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So I don't know if all the other replies are pretending to be stupid, but the shown prompt is not stupid.

If you include stuff like that section in your prompt, then it has been shown that the AI will be more likely to output secure code. Hence of course the section should be included in the prompt.

If it looks stupid but it works, then it is not stupid.

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Firstly, it can work and still be stupid.
Secondly, since the chat bot is more likely but not certain to write secure, bug-free code, it does not in fact work and is therefore, by your own reasoning, stupid.
But so is asking a chat bot for code to begin with, so there wasn't ever really a way around that.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

since the chat bot is more likely but not certain to write secure, bug-free code, it does not in fact work

Humans are not certain to write secure, bug-free code. So human code is useless, by the very same metric?

What kind of "logic" is that?

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Humans understand the concepts of "writing code" and "bug fixing". Chat bots do not understand, period.