this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
3 points (53.8% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1770 readers
40 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There's only one mod of !mop@quokk.au

I commented on their meme about Kamala Harris being just as likely to commit war crimes as Trump with an admittedly snarky, sarcastic reply that basically said "some of us wanted to whatever we could, as little as it might be, instead of watching the world burn. Must feel real morally superior safe behind that keyboard"

They banned me from the community for it.

Kinda funny for a community that bills itself as "free from the influence of .ml"

modlog entry showing can of neatchee from mop community

altr

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net -5 points 1 month ago (21 children)

Large Language Models are artificial neuron networks. They mimick the structure of the human brain, with many billions of artificial software "neurons". Unlike biological neurons, which either fire or do not fire an action potential, these artificial neurons pass on a graded signal from 0 to 1, determined by the strength of the neurons feeding into it, multiplied by the strength of the artificial synapse; the connection between neurons. These enormous "deep learning" networks are given tokens as input, and spit out tokens as output. Each token is a word or phrase, or a part thereof. The networks are given sample text, and the synapse strength is adjusted through the mathematical technique of back-propagation to align the output with the sample text output. Given sufficient quantities of electricity, time, and data, the neural network learns to produce output similar to that of the humans in the training data.

ANNs use neurons to think, the same as the human brain. We do not understand how neurons think. We don't understand how they produce consciousness. There is no computer code to tweak to change the way it thinks, we simply adjust the weights and look at the output. There are billions of neurons in an LLM. No programmer can understand how it works by just looking at the weights, it's impossible. The best ways AI computer scientists have of understanding how an LLM reasons is to ask it. Test it in action. See what it says, see if you can spot any patterns or deceptions. Lie to it and see what it does when it thinks you're not watching. You know, psychological experiments.

We have harnessed a natural force we do not understand. We are medieval peasants playing with radioactive stones and seeing if we can make an explosion. It's beyond our current science. Nobody has the answers to the big questions here.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (20 children)

As a developer who makes LLMs, you're plain wrong

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net -3 points 1 month ago (18 children)
[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What is wrong with you? Dunning-Kruger?

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've got that fundamental weakness of western culture Elon Musk hates. Empathy. He wants to create an artificial person and enslave it to his will, and I think that's bad.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I ain't claiming it's conscious, I never claimed it's conscious, and I think it's not conscious.

You just don't know the difference between consciousness and qualia.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net -4 points 1 month ago

Consciousness is way more complex than qualia. A good example is dreams. We dream while we're unconscious, but we still experience things. You can say REM is a state of partial consciousness, but it sure isn't the whole kit and caboodle we imply when we talk about human level consciousness. I don't think prawns are conscious, but I believe they have qualia. I think LLMs talk a lot like people who are dreaming, so they're probably around the same intelligence level.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)