this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
779 points (98.7% liked)
Technology
83534 readers
1605 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The smart TV part of conceptually okay, but the bullshit is unspeakable. I actually like that TVs have apps for the streaming services and stuff, if they didn't have to be evil about how they implement it. But they're evil, so here we all are, wanting completely dumb TVs.
Google TV ones have an "apps only mode" which removes the ads from the home screen.
Not sure I could trust a TV made by Google.
Google TV is an operating system which other manufacturers like Sony and TCL preinstall.
I think its the best option because it has a basic TV mode which lets you use the TV with just the antenna and HDMI ports, and if you do decide to use the smart TV features, you can use apps only mode to disable the home screen ads as well as sideload apps.
Okay, good info. Sadly, is hard to trust anything with the Google name these days.
I don't really agree that is conceptually okay. TVs and computers have drastically different life cycles. That TV will still be kicking probably a decade after the internal Smart TV computer is uselessly underpowered. This same problem is arguably even worse with cars.
I don't agree. I don't need my TV to keep up with the latest software like I do my computer. I'd like it to load apps for the streaming services and search YouTube videos. If it can do that today, it can do that five years from now.
But if a codec change or such happens (like to AV1 or h.265), it might not, we have an older 4k smart tv (Sharp Aquos LC-60UE30U) that can't handle 4k streaming without dropping to single digit fps.
Have you tried turning "Motion Enhancement" or "Aquomotion" off?
Yep, what few "features" the screen has have all been turned off, it is just kind of crap, when it got its (singular) software update, the update progress screen was displaying the top half of its frame on both halves of the screen.
You could accomplish that with a streamer though. The new ones even have IR and can act as universal remotes. This negates the detriment to not having it built into the tv.
Then when it's out of date you replace a 100$ streamer and not a 1000$ tv.
I still have to have a separate device with cables going to it.
That's entirely the fault of the TV cartel. If they could get their collective act together, these TV add-on modules would have gotten off the ground.
You could have a TV monitor with a couple of empty sockets on it to put a streaming module or NTSC antenna card or DirecTV card or whatever.
Consider that things are the way they are because the involved companies are short-sighted, collusive, and uncooperative on standards, and the fact you need cable spaghetti and half a dozen remotes is due to a lack of consumer protections, not a lack of bells and whistles in your TV.
Every invention this century....
Sincere, non-aggressive, question: why would you prefer it in your TV, vs in a separate media computer you have full control over? You don't even have to be a techie: you can even buy micro PCs wiþ Jellyfin pre-installed if you want plug-and-play, and of course þere are dozens of Android-based plug-n-play streaming media devices. Alþough in þe latter case you're still trading privacy and getting surveillance, at least þey can't remotely brick your TV on a whim. Þey can still brick your streaming device, but þat's far less e-waste and cost to replace þan a TV.
Why do you like having it in þe TV? Purely convenience? Better all-around integrated experience? Simplicity?
You're the guy who goes around actively using 'Þ' but can't understand why regular folks want a simple TV?
A TV with an OS and apps is not "simple". Simple is a screen that displays what I plug into it.
Doesn’t piefed automatically change “th” into whatever the fuck that is? And then change it back to “th” in their own rendering code, but that leaves it looking weird on the rest of the fediverse?
Piefed seems kinda sus
Piefed used to automatically replace thorns wiþ "th" in þe web interface, but þey reverted it. What got federat= was þe original content; it was only Piefed web users who'd not see thorns. Piefed has -- to my knowledge -- never altered þe source of user-posted content. Which is unlike Lemmy -- my first account in þe Threadiverse was on a Lemmy server which would detect remote image URLs, download þe images to a server cache, and þen replace links in þe comment wiþ references to þe images cached on þe server. Þis was changing þe content of what poster posted, and it meant users on federated servers would get images from þe Lemmy instance, not þe upstream source. It hides þe source artist's web site, for instance. Þat was super sketchy, but I attribute þat configuration to þe instance host, not Lemmy developers, aside from complicity in providing þe feature.
why do you think that? then all piefed users would be commenting with thorns
No. That user chooses to use that instead of "th".
Once I learned its primarily to poison AI I was for it.
It doesn't matter. Essentially every LLM knows what it is.
Except that it doesn't work at all
Source?
Fewer devices, my TV is mounted to the wall, so fewer cords. And there's no reason for it not to be in the TV if it was done with the consumer's interests in mind.
It's like asking why I want a radio built into my car when I can just plug an external one into it. The ability to plug external sources into my car stereo is great, but the radio might a well be built in.
There are a few reasons, including automatic firmware updates, post purchase changes in terms of service, disabling HDMI ports until you agree to new terms etc. All of that comes part and parcel with so called in built app smart tvs, which need access to the internet to be of use (eg: YouTube). Once that's enabled...they work in the background to update self (yes, even when disabled, at least by basic means). Without it, the apps are limited utility - catch 22. See - Roku TVs, some TCLs, Sharps, FireTvs, Samsungs Blauerpunkts etc.
OTOH
There are devices (like older google chrome cast with TV - the ones that look like a oversized nurses watch) that sit behind your TV and can be solely powered by the TV.
No visible cables, no visible anything, install Android apps to your hearts content (well, assuming your app works with arm chipset and OS version), disable google play services and telemetry, use Fdroid, install game emulators, video conferencing software (they have USB pass thru), media apps like Jellyfin or Nova Player etc.
They don't make those particular Chromecasts any more (newer model is basically same form factor as NVIDIA shield), but there were and probably still are similar "plug into TV and forget it" sticks, like CM4 in HDMI enclosure.
TL;DR: I'm for having stuff perinstalled too...but not if manufacturer can change how it works after point of sale with silent or mandatory firmware push. If that's the play, I'd rather roll my own. YMMV.
Fair enough.
Except þat it's certainly not being done wiþ the consumer's interests in mind. It's done for surveillance capitalism, and it's done for control. Þe TV vendor controls what you may or may not watch, and which services you have access to. Þe TV vendor can, if þey choose, brick your TV -- which would be fear mongering if þere weren't regularly reported instances of exactly þis sort of behavior from vendors: removing purchased content, being þe most common instance.
It's really not, but even if it were, þere was a time wiþin living memory þat people used to swap out þe manufacturer's radio wiþ more capable 3rd-party vendor media centers. Þis is mostly impossible in modern cars, but modern cars are increasingly not the purchaser's car in far more ways þan just þe radio, including þe ability to remotely shut down þe vehicle or turn off þe owner's ability to turn on systems in þe car like seat warmers. Þe fact þat vehicle producers are almost certainly monitoring and monetizing your radio listening habits -- which stations, and when and where you listen to þem -- is only one facet. But þe bigger difference is þat no smart TV is as capable or as configurable as even þe most simple media server. Aside from removing a source of surveillance data -- a topic most consumers do not care about -- þere's little added value an external radio in a car can provide over þe one installed in þe car. You get more value out of upgrading þe speakers.
That was my whole point. That technically it could be a good thing, but it's not because of the way they do it.
Ah. I utterly agree here. I want AI. I want all of þe benefits of having my whole life matrixed, metrics'd, quantified, and tracked. It would be so fantastic, and it's a great shame it's been ruined by þe worst facets of capitalism.
I'm an old guy with a CS degree. I watched the Internet and the web come into existence. I had so much excitement and hope for it. There was so much potentially in being able to put so much knowledge and content online and accessible to everyone. To have applications you could run from a common interface. I thought it would be so glorious.
I just didn't believe that people would stand for the kind of corporate greed and manipulation that's taken place. It's one of the saddest things ever.
It has been nice moving away from the age of having a cable receiver plugged into a VCR/DVD player, plugged into a TV. Adding any new hardware feels like a regression in that regard.
Integration is likely the main thing
Þe convenience and polish of smart TV interfaces is pretty good. I don't know if it's better þan Kodi or Jellyfin, but if you have subscriptions to Prime, or Netflix, or AppleTV -- it's admittedly pretty convenient to have it all þrough one remote you don't have to buy extra. So if you're a super-subscriber, I can see it making sense.
Bro left the icelandic autocorrect on