this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
756 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

83502 readers
3613 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] markz@suppo.fi 244 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Now gimme one without smart tv bullshit

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Just attach your own streaming media player like Nvidia Shield or Chromecast or some other such device and you can just boot into that and bypass all smart TV features

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago (7 children)

They exist, but they're called commercial monitors

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Any TV which lets you skip Wi-Fi in the setup can be a dumb TV. Most smart TVs except Roku/Fire TV let you.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Are there gaming screens like that though? Cause I thought commercial monitors were all slow response.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've got a 43" Aorus 4k gaming screen for my desktop. 144Hz, freesync, 2 HDMI's a DisplayPort and a USBC. There is a 48" OLED as well, but I didn't have the space for it at the time.

After using a 4k 43" for a monitor for a few years, I definitely both recommend it AND wish companies would make 8k ones.

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does anything useful even come in 8K at this point? I saw it as a spec last time I went television shopping, but it seemed like something that wouldn't be useful for another decade.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

8k is effectively dead

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

8K was always a lie. It's impossible to tell the difference from 4K unless you're too close, 4K already has more pixels than your eyes do.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 5 points 15 hours ago

4k is about 8 million pixels. The human eye has a resolution of about 576 megapixels.

I know what you mean with your comment, but the way you expressed it is factually incorrect

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 23 hours ago

Technically, all TVs have more pixels than your eyes do

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 17 hours ago

I think it's already the case for 1080p at the distance most people put their TV.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This ad brought to you by the gigabyte marketing division

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Honestly, nah. The screen is awesome, don't get me wrong, but the fact that I had to replace the main board after 1.5yrs, just out of warranty, means I definitely recommend people don't buy it. Luckily I found someone on eBay that dropped theirs, shattered the screen, and sold the internal boards for $50 shipped.

I only brought it up because it fits the requirements and I recommend the format. 4k 43"+ or 8k is goated on desktop.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

He should have said commerical displays, which are basically TV's rated for long continuous use e.g. digital signage.

I haven't dealt with them in some time, but I would imagine many, if not most, do not include consumer smart tv features, although they probably have other embedded smart tech to help with stuff like signage.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 2 points 18 hours ago

No I understand he’s talking about displays, I think I must have backspaced that and undid it at some point. But those commercial displays are not built with fast response rates because they’re literally just built to display one image at a time. Using them for gaming would suck.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 day ago (22 children)

The smart TV part of conceptually okay, but the bullshit is unspeakable. I actually like that TVs have apps for the streaming services and stuff, if they didn't have to be evil about how they implement it. But they're evil, so here we all are, wanting completely dumb TVs.

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Google TV ones have an "apps only mode" which removes the ads from the home screen.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure I could trust a TV made by Google.

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Google TV is an operating system which other manufacturers like Sony and TCL preinstall.

I think its the best option because it has a basic TV mode which lets you use the TV with just the antenna and HDMI ports, and if you do decide to use the smart TV features, you can use apps only mode to disable the home screen ads as well as sideload apps.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Okay, good info. Sadly, is hard to trust anything with the Google name these days.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't really agree that is conceptually okay. TVs and computers have drastically different life cycles. That TV will still be kicking probably a decade after the internal Smart TV computer is uselessly underpowered. This same problem is arguably even worse with cars.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I don't agree. I don't need my TV to keep up with the latest software like I do my computer. I'd like it to load apps for the streaming services and search YouTube videos. If it can do that today, it can do that five years from now.

[–] Verat@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But if a codec change or such happens (like to AV1 or h.265), it might not, we have an older 4k smart tv (Sharp Aquos LC-60UE30U) that can't handle 4k streaming without dropping to single digit fps.

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Have you tried turning "Motion Enhancement" or "Aquomotion" off?

[–] Verat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Yep, what few "features" the screen has have all been turned off, it is just kind of crap, when it got its (singular) software update, the update progress screen was displaying the top half of its frame on both halves of the screen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Every invention this century....

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

I bought a 48" OLED "monitor" that has none.

load more comments (12 replies)