chat

8613 readers

212 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net

Sulvy@hexbear.net

oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net

Wakmrow@hexbear.net

LeninWeave@hexbear.net

abc@hexbear.net

Give me the fair and balanced position on the Spanish Civil War (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 month ago by CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net to c/chat@hexbear.net

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It has been over half my lifetime since I read an in depth history of the Spanish civil war.

Anyway, some anarchists I used to roll with criticized Stalin for turning against the Spanish Anarchists during the Spanish Civil War, killing some and abandoning the othera. I thought at the time, "what the hell? Why would the Communists betray those who were fighting against their common enemy? I see some of the historical basis for fighting the Anarchists within the USSR, but why in Spain, when the fascists were by far the biggest problem? It can't have just been " Stalin was a bad dude", that's not how it works. So what were the material and political reasons for that betrayal? Was it even a betrayal? (I am looking for the ML perspective on this more than the anarchist perspective because I've heard plenty of the Anarchist side and not the "tankie" side)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

I agree but in my defense or their defense, at the time we had these talks, these anarchists were always talking about some new books on history and theory they were reading. Way more literate and thoroughly read than I, mostly reading my fiction horror sci fi slop.

However I have since concluded from a lot of fucked up abusive shit they did to me that they were stupid fucks with dogshit methodology, who lacked the intellectual rigor and moral strength to actually investigate and engage with reality rather than truisms and vibes-based analysis, which called into question everything they held true. For me thinking maybe they were just wrong about this too.