this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
71 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29315 readers
2364 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Scientists say their work on fires and climate change could be lost as the agency moves its headquarters to Utah from Washington and shuts 57 research stations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (4 children)

The only hope that gets me through these announcements is that, should we make it through all of this without turning into ruin, the pendulum is going to swing so hard in the opposite direction that agencies like this and the national park service will not only have their funding restored, but increased to what it should actually be funded at in the first place.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

I sure hope you're right

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago

Unless Trump and his project 2025 pals win their race to destroying democracy for good before next election.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Problem is that when you disperse research teams, it takes a decade or more to get back to where you were

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yeah, slim hope for sure. I just try to lean on the idea that enough in the center get activated from all of this that we can get modern New Deal that uses he conservation corps as a model for both environmental and scientific projects.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

The giveaways are already in motion, the rich aren't going to let themselves be taxed again, and you can see in realtime how they're trying to make locations compete for the privilege of hosting them, with the smallest tax rates for ultra rich... no one is going to pay for a New New Deal, all the blood's been wrung out of the middle class, and the rich are untouchable.

But I do like your optimism