this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
107 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55306 readers
1703 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Extremely rare. This thing is like a tank in the sky.

I also thought they Warthogs were antiquated as CAS? Fucking dipshit Kegsbreath (Epstein War aside)

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are great for fighting wars against goat herders who live in caves, which apparently is the only military we can fight.

[–] Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

This. We got so use to fighting farmers with guns and rpgs that we have no experience fighting an actual army.

I really don't look forward to when we actually throw hands with a really powerful military. I feel we will see a lot of American troops dead.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago

They're old, but still the most effective in that role. At least when they don't have the threat of being shot down.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Extremely rare.

Not really, A10s have the highest loss rate of any post-Vietnam US aircraft.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Hunting warthogs has always been popular...

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Are you factoring in as a percent of combat sorties and proportionality? Because when taking this into account, I'm not sure that's right.

And has numerous incidents of being blown to bits and still returning to base. The pilot themselves is literally inside a "titanium bathtub".

Keep in mind finally that the nature of this aircraft is not to engage from a stand-off distance but rather be up close. Ultimately I'm really curious what brought this bird down.

... The V-22 Osprey on the other hand... Look at it wrong and she falls out of the sky.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

F-16s flew a little over 13,000 sorties during Desert Storm with fewer losses and (importantly) a higher mission success rate. Also Chuck Horner was on record as saying that he kept A-10s away from anywhere the Iraqi Republican Guard was operating as they had access to actually functional air defenses that would have shredded the A-10s.

Basically A-10 pilots bragging about Desert Storm is like someone being sent to go wrestle some toddlers and coming back with a bloodied nose and broken bones and bragging about how tough and resilient they were not to have bled out.

Not to mention it is no longer 1991 and the A-10 is even less useful on a modern battlefield.