this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
682 points (98.3% liked)

News

37090 readers
1125 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a US representative, said on Wednesday that she will oppose any future US military aid to Israel, including for defensive systems.

In a statement on social media, Ocasio-Cortez said that Israel was fully capable of funding “Iron Dome and other defensive systems”, and that “consistent with my voting record to date, I will not support Congress sending more taxpayer dollars and military aid to a government that consistently ignores international law and US law”.

Her remarks on Wednesday follow reports that she pledged to oppose any future military aid to Israel during a New York City Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) forum on Tuesday evening.

“Our allies who need our military aid must understand that we will provide it consistent with the Leahy amendment and the foreign assistance act”, Ocasio-Cortez added, referring to a law which prohibits the US from providing military support to army units that violate human rights.

According to City & State, which obtained a partial recording of the DSA forum, Ocasio-Cortez told members: “I have not once ever voted to authorize funding to Israel, and I will never,” adding that “the Israeli government should be able to finance their own weapons if they seek to arm themselves.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

would be nice to do palestinian aid and recognize its not a forgone conclusion that it be annexed and if we for some reason do give aid lets at least limit weaponry we might give them and hey lets work to keep aid channels open to palestine. you know. all the stuff we were doing until 2025.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

all the stuff we were doing until 2025.

Literally what? This is all stuff Democrats (including AOC herself) were flamed for not doing until 2025.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

nope they were flamed for not doing more. we had limits on weapons and getting aid to isreal was a fight even though it got through. there was aid to plestine. we friggen made a dock to get around israel blockading areas. peoples memories are either miniscule or they edit them as it goes by.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is historical revisionism.

we had limits on weapons

Literally one paused shipment. Big fucking deal.

getting aid to isreal was a fight even though it got through

The overwhelming majority regularly voting yes is not my idea of a fight.

there was aid to plestine.

There was aid during Trump's term too. In both cases it was Israel dictating how much aid got through.

we friggen made a dock to get around israel blockading areas

A useless dock that was criticized for being useless the moment it was announcement and eventually was used by the IDF.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

its not revisionist. the limits where on types and size of weapons. your reply shows it exactly. it was not good enough so lets just choose worse. before trump we were trying but now its just israel calling the shots. we friggin attacked iran. jeez just a bit after he took office the plans for the west bank as a vacation destination were thrown up. I just don't get folks that can't tell the difference between better and worse.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the limits where on types and size of weapons.

There were no limits other than a pause on one shipment of 2000 pound bombs. That is almost literally nothing.

before trump we were trying

Your thoughts and prayers don't matter to the Palestinians Israel was starving to death.

Israel was always calling the shots with regards to Palestine; Trump is just more blatant about it. He's also worse on Iran, but that's a completely different conversation.

it was not good enough so lets just choose worse

That doesn't have fucking anything with what we're talking about. You made a claim about Democrats; you don't get to deflect by talking about Republicans.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

its completely what we are talking about. perfect being the enemy of good. The use of pause is pretty disengenous. yes it was paused until 2025 when trump took office which is what stopped the pause. your whole middle section again shows you can't tell the difference between better and worse. I would never want you "working" to help me. this reminds me so much of obama care. that half a loaf has made things a bit better for me than the no loaf some people seem to prefer. don't get me wrong I want the whole loaf but refusing to let anyone get the half to make a moral stand is not helping them.