this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
517 points (98.5% liked)

World News

55353 readers
3195 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca -1 points 6 days ago (3 children)

If it's just to test the equipment why risk the lives of the astronauts?

[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

So that the Astronauts can actually test the equipment?

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

Because future missions might also be manned. Better to risk small missions first to iron out the kinks than to have a big problem later that could have been noticed by you know, testing the vessel.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Because they need to sell this porkbarrel to the public.

Read the comments...we would rather send a few people to a dead rock than cure diseases.

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Science from space has been used plenty of times to help advance medicine though. And the thing about it is, you never know what you're going to discover until you actually discover it. NASA budget is 3% of the US military budget, maybe focus complaints where it's actually warranted.

We already know how to build houses or grow food, yet we still have a housing crisis and famines around the world.

What good will these potential cures bring? We already have cures for many many diseases, why are those diseases still existing?

Any potential cures from this will ultimately be owned by the same corpos that own current cures/tech. And it will be sold back to the people for hundred of thousands of dollers in order to justify their huge "R&D" costs.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

NASA budget is 3% of the US military budget, maybe focus complaints where it’s actually warranted.

All diseases research is 0% of the US military budget.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is a shit take. It's not one or the other with spaceflight and curing diseases.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

It’s not one or the other with spaceflight and curing diseases

It is in 2025 onwards. The country is $39T in debt, tens of billions got funneled to SpaceX on a failed Mars project, and in the same year, $35B gets cut from NIH.

Lucky for Trump, you guys have you heads so far up your asses looking at rockets and shiny things, no one will notice.