this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
59 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42568 readers
437 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A New Mexico jury on Tuesday ordered Meta to pay $375m in civil penalties after it found the company misled consumers about the safety of its platforms and enabled harm, including child sexual exploitation, against its users.

This is the first jury trial to find Meta liable for acts committed on its platform.

“The jury’s verdict is a historic victory for every child and family who has paid the price for Meta’s choice to put profits over kids’ safety,” said New Mexico’s attorney general, Raúl Torrez.

“Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew. Today the jury joined families, educators, and child safety experts in saying enough is enough.”

The lawsuit was brought by Torrez’s office in December 2023. The lawsuit followed a two-year Guardian investigation published in April of that year revealing how Facebook and Instagram had become marketplaces for child sex trafficking. That investigation was cited several times in the complaint.

The jury ordered Meta to pay the maximum penalty under the law of $5,000 per violation, totaling $375m in civil penalties for violating New Mexico’s consumer protection laws. The jury found Meta liable for both claims brought by the state of New Mexico under the Unfair Practices Act.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bl4kers@beehaw.org 7 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

the maximum penalty under the law of $5,000 per violation

This is far too low in this context. Perhaps it should be a percentage of annual revenue or profit or something instead of a fixed amount.

[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 1 points 14 hours ago

This should be the case for all penalties, from traffic to whatever. Just make it an increasing part of revenues and wealth, condemned to x% based on table.

So the rich feel it too.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

But, but ... clutches pearls that would be socialism. We can't expect our benevolent overlords to pay for crimes in a manner that would affect them. We reserve that for Jean Valjean.

[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 1 points 14 hours ago

Laws are made to protect the wealthy by constraining the poor without protecting the poor or constraining the wealthy.

Poorly translated from local language by me.