this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
96 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42548 readers
376 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It seems like professional equipment will not be affected:

While the FCC’s Covered List makes it sound like the US is banning all “routers produced in a foreign country,” it’s defined a bit more narrowly than that. It’s specifically banning “consumer-grade routers” as defined in NIST Internal Report 8425A, which refers to ones “intended for residential use and can be installed by the customer.”

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That's not reassuring. It sounds like they don't want home users to be able to get any router they could manage themselves.

[–] StealthLizardDrop@piefed.social 4 points 13 hours ago

nail ~~on~~ in the head

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

I'm not sure their like bananapi based router would be considered professional. More home tinkerer

I'm not sure what that'll mean for the impact of this change, but I guess we'll see 🤷🏻‍♂️