(I covered 15 N-words and 2 archaic slurs for Chinese people in case you couldn't figure out what's behind the redactions.)
The link to the invidious search in the screenshot: https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/search?q=Kylan
The guy's actual channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfv1B_6SYzvePjW-4p9YG9g
I was reading comments on a flesh simulator crashout video and saw a couple of his viewers expressing delight that each other knew of this channel. So I looked it up to see what had them so giddy.
They were speculating that Flesh Simulator would "not be able to fly under the radar this long" (paraphrasing)
I listened to about one third of "never trust a n-word with a gun" and the uploader has
a lengthy pinned defensive comment, this is only part of it. Censorship by me.
C--- (slur for black people) songs were embraced and enjoyed by all races. They often had racial themes, but they weren't inherently discriminatory, at least not initially. Throwing out this ENTIRE era of American musical innovation just because a word changed meaning decades later is practically criminal. Because of today's delicate woke sensibilities, they have erased essentially an entire musical genre, and it was indeed a juggernaut of the time.
C--- (slur for black people) songs were America's FIRST original music style and they took the world by storm. That's not to excuse the language and imagery used, but these words were not considered slurs when they were originally used in the 19th century. Many of the greatest c--- song writers were both white and black, and both races frequently collaborated together on these songs!
This song from 1886 is a remarkable example of the attitudes of the people at the time. It lampoons whites who are "hiding in the shade" and calls out their hypocrisy for denying guns to blacks unless there's a war, in which case they're happy to send them to the front lines. It concludes that black people are braver and better fighters than whites.
It's unclear if the composers of this song were black or white, but honestly, it doesn't really matter. My guess is that they were white. This should fly in the face of what we're told about this era. I'm not saying we go back to that time, on the contrary. However, studying these songs has completely opened my eyes to a different picture of race relations at the time.
This song was obviously meant to be performed for black and white audiences, and both would have thoroughly enjoyed it at the time (just like today!).
It's really unfortunate songs like this have been so thoroughly memory-holed or maligned. I realize some people don't see things like I do, and that's fine. But I still feel it's an invaluable task to preserve these important American cultural relics so that we have a better understanding of our past and how we got to this point today.
So yes, I will continue posting these beautiful and often provocative songs. Don't listen if you don't like them. But I know there are those out there who appreciate my efforts here, and hopefully it will inspire others to learn more about our rich and dynamic American musical tradition. It's really important we keep it alive, especially in our 250th this year.
It's not like race relations are peachy keen today. I tend to believe that reviving this type of racial humor will ease tensions instead of raising them. After all, if we can laugh at each other, we're more likely going to be able to get along.
Which yeah okay, big if true I suppose and I could understand wanting to read a book or essay exploring this topic. By all means explore and seek more cultural truth about the era through looking at this music and its context. Is that what this channel is?
I have a suspicion that this guy might just enjoy recording himself smirking and winking at the camera while singing the n-word. Just a funny feeling I have. 
Maybe I'm wrong and his audience are actually curious little budding historians.
(Again, comments from "Never Trust a N-word With a Gun")
as expected.
Anyway. Just thought I'd share. Hope this post isn't too shambolic for c/slop. Be a shame if youtube account havers reported the channel, what with all its priceless historical artifacts of some chud singing "move along n----- move along"
Yeah, this is uh....unfortunate.
I only watched like 30 seconds of the "n-word with a gun" video and the description does seem, i dunno, genuine? But I'm having a reeeeeeal hard time believing this is all just about history, and lampooning of white men and politics. Maybe he believes that, but I doubt his audience of youtubers does.
its a weird one. he also has a pretty significant financial incentive to convince himself of whatever helps him sleep at night. It would take a greater masochist than me to try and untangle that shit.
I'm leaning towards, ultimately, if "its just words" then so is all that horseshit he feels the need to write as a disclaimer and I don't have to lend any particular weight to them or assume good faith in a guy who decided this was to be his area of expertise at this point in history.
If he's not just a nazi then I feel a different kind of revulsion for what is presumably either soul selling activity or total self interested apathy. He's clearly too intelligent for me to give him the benefit of the doubt in any way really.
edit: And he's an American. Let some freaky USA-phile in another country fetishise that shit outside of the context where it currently only serves the most vile impulses in the society that spawned it. (finished editing lol)
Right, I'm with you, its just so bizarre I dont think I've seen anything quite like it.
Yea, didn't mean to preach right at you, just sorta started to firm up my interpretation draw some solid conclusions while replying.
I'm still trying to interrogate myself about why my initial reaction is "wow this is weird, what's the story here" instead of seeing it through They Live sunglasses immediately. Like I can smell the 4chan on him but there's still a part of me that didn't want to rush to judgement?
Closest I can figure is:
its because he's doing what I do when I fedpost on hexbear, but do it in a way that provides me and hexbear with enough plausible deniability about my intentions as to make it ambiguous whether I'm actually breaking any rules and whether it would be worth censoring the posts. I'm not doing it in bad faith and I believe my fedposts align with hexbear's values, so I think what I'm doing is okay and provides contextual cover for entertaining posting.
This guy also is aligning himself with his platform's values and providing a plausible deniability cover for: the platform against the world, himself against the world and himself against the platform.
Its not even sophisticated, but its unusual for someone with the inclination to do this to also put the effort into being so productive, usually this is bottomfeeder behaviour. (self report?)