politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Yeah...
Giant absolute piece of shit and 99.99% of the reason it's such a giant grift that systematically cover up sexual abuse...
I think the problem is, you think "modern cheerleading" has been a good thing for the decades that this one piece of shit controlled everything tangentially associated to it.
And:
https://www.thecheerbuzz.com/the-dark-side-of-cheerleading-new-york-times-investigates-varsity-spirit/
But I do want to applaud you for actually using a question mark, even if it seems to have been rhetorical.
inb4 guy turns out to be a major sex offender and/or a pedophile
Nope, four years too late:
https://apnews.com/article/sports-lawsuits-business-tennessee-sexual-abuse-5095b649ad29005c84aaa06c6dc107bb
All a creep has to do is cut Webb a check, and you could open a team that young girls and their parents would do anything to be a part of.
A lot of those coaches were just randos in their 20s/30s who wanted access to athletic kids with zero oversights and frequent hotel trips.
There's been a bunch of lawsuits, but Varsity tries to hold zero accountability despite being the oversight body that's actediting the coaches/gyms.
To think that as these children "filter up" to the more elite teams the behavior stops would be incredibly naive. Hell, even just the social media pipeline from it is bad, but absolutely no one is looking out for these kids in real life either.
That sounds about right. Running an organization for kids and teens is always going to be either an eternal battle to keep pedos out or the creation of a den of pedos. I've got no judgment for orgs that fight that battle sincerely, and understand that sometimes they'll fail, but any that don't fight that battle are going to leave me suspicious of the leadership's motivation, even though it's damning regardless.
Oh wow, that's what not enforcing anti trust law does to a country
Your post links the 2024 https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/22/magazine/cheerleading-jeff-webb.html?unlocked_article_code=1.VVA.cJzt.B1vLYzHL5868
Goodness, this should really be the focus instead of Charlie Kirk, Pickleball, or speculating about sex offenses (on the last matter he's already transitioned cheerleading from a male-only sport for chrissakes). And that's just from the first
~~quarter~~ half of the article.
"Speculating" is a weird word choice after multiple federal investigations...
Have you ever considered asking questions instead of assuming you already know everything immediately after reading a 3-5 sentence social media comment?
You do understand that almost nothing can be explained like that, right?
Yeah in hindsight I probably shouldn't have used "speculating about". But my point remains that these are eclipsed by the far bigger and similarly life-altering pain he is inflicting that isn't sexual abuse when you have this gargantuan monopoly putting them through torture, self-reinforcing groups that are the only life you'll ever know and shuns those who blow the whistle, and taking away their brain function through chronic traumatic encephalopathy.
But those I juries are happening more in traditional cheer trying to emulate "competitive" and that's the fault of schools letting them do complicated throws/stunts.
I'm not saying you shouldn't be upset about the insane 500% increase in serious injury, I'm saying you're not blaming the people responsible for the vast amount of them.
You don't understand this, because again, you just learned about it from what I had posted on social media and I stantly decided you somehow knew more than the person who has been aware of this for more than 45 minutes.
You did follow links and read articles, props for that...
But still, ask more questions, don't assume 10 minutes makes you an expert
So wait, they monetized cheerleading? Like in schools public schools too or just colleges and professionally?
The dead asshole basically created a "competitive" version.
So while the people in this might start out doing a school team, they'll using go "competitive" as soon as able and work really hard at it and often quit normal cheer.
It's essentially the same as the "dance moms" shit. It becomes the central aspect of these kids lives. I don't know what age ranges they have, but it's like jr high or even younger.
But the existence of "competitive" makes traditional cheer try to emulate it. There's been like a 500% increase in serious injury because everyone is trying to do crazy shit
wait he was the one that got people to doubt their commitment to Sparkle Motion?
Didn’t King of the Hill do an episode about the change in cheerleading?
I don’t know anything at all about cheerleading in general or what it means for it to be modern a cheerleading. I don’t watch sports, I don’t have kids, and I’ve never heard of this guy. The statements from him about other people and other people about him saying enough. I mean, he’s getting lauded by Posobiec - he must be completely awful.
The two big things you'd see on court/field is:
"Stunts" where people are thrown which is very dangerous.
The outfit change to sports bras and booty shorts.
Both direct results of "competitive" cheer ran by this guy filtering down to actual cheerleading done along with a sport.
Culturally off the field....
A bunch of impressionable and attractive cheerleaders went from having school employees responsible for them, to any random person with the money to cut a check to Varsity (this guy's company).
Even if not to groom them for abuse, a lot of people want to be seen as "cool" and create an environment for drinking and drug use, blurring the lines between adult and child in the process.
It's incredibly problematic but since it's also so cult like, very few people have spoken out about it. By the time you see the bad parts, you're already "hazed in" and don't understand how fuckendup shit is.