this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
46 points (91.1% liked)

Fuck AI

6441 readers
1032 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
46
Lemmy may be heading down the path of LLMs (leminal.space)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) by ell1e@leminal.space to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Sadly, it seems like Lemmy is going to integrate LLM code going forward: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/6385 If you comment on the issue, please try to make sure it's a productive and thoughtful comment and not pure hate brigading.

Consider upvoting the issue to show community interest.

Edit: perhaps I should also mention this one here as a similar discussion: https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/issues/31 This one concerns the Linux kernel. I hope you'll forgive me this slight tangent, but more eyes could benefit this one too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Use of so-called Artificial Intelligence (AI) is allowed only if it is explicitly mentioned. Additionally all LLM-generated text or code must be manually reviewed by the author before submission (no vibe coding allowed).

Linus Torvalds has the best take regarding using “AI” for software development a documentation.

As I said in private elsewhere, I do not want any kernel development documentation to be some AI statement. We have enough people on both sides of the "sky is falling" and "it's going to revolutionize software engineering", I don't want some kernel development docs to take either stance.

It's why I strongly want this to be that "just a tool" statement.

source

Using it in a staging environment should be perfectly acceptable usage, review it and adjust it before introducing it on a production build, treat is like a tool and not a one-click magic code machine.

[–] ell1e@leminal.space 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

That doesn't take into account the extensively researched plagiarism concerns. It's not just that it's low quality slop but that some of us think the GPL won't work if you can just train LLMs on GPL, then have it spit out GPL snippets un-GPL'ed.

Some people literally un-GPL projects via AI in one go. While that's the egregious version, any LLM use seems to risk having a similar effect in a smaller scope.

This isn't only a legal question. At least if you think the GPL has societal and moral value.