Yet either way you try to (re)define it both reflect either states ruling class bias and you arbitrarily decide to dismiss one of those and didn't even realize about the existence of the other.

I’m saying that some sources are worse than others.

And I'm saying it's a logical fallacy to dismiss it in it's entirety, as there exists context where these sources of information are valuable.

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Because it’s essentially what you’re saying in subtext.

No, I didn’t imply any of this.

I don't like any of the media we mentioned in this dialogue. Not because of where they get their funding, but because of their content. I explained why I don't like TASS above in this comment section.

[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Whether you like or dislike a source is a personal reaction that doesn't determine its factual accuracy

[–] Shatur@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but their content does.

[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

On an article to article basis dependent on the context. Not as the entire outlet like you suggest. You're intellectually dishonest to yourself if you do