this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
68 points (95.9% liked)

3DPrinting

22024 readers
93 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Despite the tech-cool factor of the project, Tom's Hardware does not condone making your own weapons system at home.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

While I am fully opposed to a 3d printer ban (and abhor the efforts of Bambu et al to sneak that in), it is very important to understand why that is not a fair comparison and, if anything, sets a threshold that can be used to argue FOR a ban.

I've ranted in detail before so I'll do the short version this time:

You are not going to make a barrel or springs yourself. And the good news is that you don't need to. None of that is a controlled/registered part (for the vast majority of guns) and you can literally buy those at a walmart equivalent. And there at least used to be pre-packaged bundles available online for your ghost gun needs.

So that mostly leaves the receiver and fire control unit. I will bet you money that giving a rando off the street 24 hours to figure out how to go to the local communal machine shop and make even a frigging sten and they will fail miserably. Whereas there are videos (fuck vice for how they abused their workers but old-vice has a really good video where they literally made the gun Luigi allegedly used) of people going from 0 to glock in 12 hours of print time and 4-5 hours of filing.

And that is the big difference. How much that matters when you are considering a country where you can buy the same gear that Tier 1 Special Forces use to abduct (admittedly really shitty) world leaders for under a thousand bucks is a HUGE question. But from the "ghost gun" perspective? There is VERY much a big difference between having a CNC and machining a receiver+FCU versus doing the same with an Ender 3.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Why don't they make firing chambers and barrels out of plastic? Are gun makers stupid?

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

There actually are some really cool proof of concepts where people have 100% 3d printed a gun. And "potato cannons" are generally a PVC firing chamber and barrel.

For legal purposes: Preface everything after this with a dozen "allegedly"s. A couple years back I went to a really cool event where people had built machine guns out of wood and plastic (FDM). No metal. Everyone went old school with leaf springs and the like. None had any issue with doing well over 100 rounds (5.56 or 5.45) each. That said, anyone with half a brain cell was literally hiding in a bunker nearby out of terror when the firing was going on. But... yeah. Also for legal purposes: I am sure every weapon was registered with the ATF prior to the event and completely destroyed on day two.

Like anything, it is about pressure, strength, and geometry. And, as The Troubles in Ireland can attest... you don't need THAT much skill to make something that will fire... once. Which is why there are so many shed machine guns and rifles with split barrels and completely exploded receivers in The Royal Armouries.

But if you want to make a barrel that can hold up to even a few dozen rounds? You need to understand what metal to use (hint: it isn't mild steel) and some pretty decent lathe skills.