this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
129 points (93.9% liked)

Fuck AI

6441 readers
1467 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Val Kilmer will be the latest Hollywood star to be resurrected by AI. The acting legend, who died last year at age 65, will star in the drama As Deep As the Grave.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mech@feddit.org 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So a cartoon character is copyrighted for 75 years after the author dies, but someone's actual visual clone can just be brought back from the dead and made to do whatever?

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

The Kilmer estate is signing off on it because they feel it's an important film Val wanted to contribute to. Doesn't make it any less gross for me, but at least there's some oversight to his image I guess.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 19 points 3 days ago

That just means someone is getting paid and doesn't give a fuck about Val Kilmer

[–] undeffeined@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago

The Kilmer estate is signing off on it because they feel it's an ~~important film Val wanted to contribute to~~ opportunity to make money out of the memory of a cherished actor.

[–] DreadPirateSnuggles@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Then they should have insisted that they mupify his corpse

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Nice. I'm putting that in my will.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's the rights to a person's likeness that can be made into a legal property that heirs can control.

This is why you don't see much marketing with, say, Elvis Presley's actual face (he was an actor - marginally capable for certain, but one nonetheless) unless it will be allowed by his heirs.

Look at it from the angle that an actor's FACE is their performative trademark, in the same way a singer's distinctive voice is theirs, or a writer's words, or a musician's composition.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not just likeness, Scarlett Johansson successfully sued a Fr*nch author for portraying her in a novel.

Why the fuck are you censoring "French"?

OpenAI wanted to use her voice as one of the voices for ChatGPT, she said no, they got someone else to record it where it sounded eerily similar to her in Her, she sued, and they dropped it out of 'respect' for her.