News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
This guy just doesn't want to be tossed under the bus. So whatever you do don't show him any praise.
2000 - 2012 he was far right 2012-2019 he was registered as a Libertarian
2019- 2021 he was registered as a Democrat
2021- present he's a Republican
This guy is a real pile of shit, and knows enough just to be an early rat to jump from the sinking ship.
[From wiki] Kent has been described as far-right.[a] He voted for George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004 before shifting his political beliefs towards libertarianism, supporting Ron Paul.[8] According to voting records, he was registered with the Libertarian Party in the 2012 presidential election until 2019, when he became a Democrat; Kent voted for Bernie Sanders in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries in order to support Republicans in that year's presidential election.[44] A spokesman for Kent described his political philosophy as "inclusive populism", rejecting discrimination.[19]
Kent has adhered to false claims of fraud in the 2020 presidential election.[45] A month following the January 6 Capitol attack, he stated Donald Trump had "no control" over the mob and attributed the severity of the attack to security planning.[12] Kent attended the Justice for J6 rally and compared the treatment of rioters to that of Iraqi citizens in the Iraq War.[46] He later called for releasing security footage of the attack,[47] and claimed the mob was brought to violence by provocateurs associated with the deep state.[48] After the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago, Kent told Steve Bannon on War Room the raid constituted "war".[49] He called for defunding the Federal Bureau of Investigation in response.[50]
Kent led a rally against a false claim that the Washington State Board of Health was set to forcefully quarantine citizens who did not get the COVID-19 vaccine in January 2022.[51] In March, he appeared at an event organized by the Washington State Three Percenters, a far-right militia.[52] Kent once advocated for a federal ban on abortion, but later narrowed his position towards states' rights.[48] By the following month, he had called for an investigation into Anthony Fauci over the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and for a complete shutdown in immigration to the United States.[44] In September, Kent stated Fauci should be charged with murder and described COVID-19 vaccines as "experimental gene therapy";[50] he is unvaccinated against COVID-19.[3] At a rally with Matt Gaetz in September 2021, Kent advocated for school vouchers and per-child tax deductions for parents.[53] Kent opposed several proposals to replace the Interstate Bridge, including tolling and light rail, in his 2024 campaign.[54]
He's resigning because he looked around and realized the people in charge of stopping terrorism are 20 year olds and aging podcaster hopped up on testorone injections to the point they're psychologically 20 again...
And we just pissed off Iran.
Attacks are coming, they've never been more likely.
And he doesn't want to be anywhere near the bag when someone has to hold it.
Sounds like Putin's plan is working as intended.
I've been saying for a while trump (or at least his domestic handlers) want a domestic terror attack because they expect it to be like 9/11 for lil Bush, but if it does happen it'll get the opposite result.
Everyone will blame trump instead of bipartisan rallying around him.
It's like watching a 4th grade pee wee football team try to run some crazy Bill Bellicheck trick play. Everyone can see the intent coming a mile away and know what they're doing, which is the opposite of what you want for a trick play.
Trump has remove anyone in Washington D.C. with talent and replace them with someone with greed.
We need a war on greed.
If he's quick enough, he can use that Reichstag fire to do a quick round of prosecution of his enemies while everyone is distracting and are yelling at each other. And once the prosecution starts, it's easy to continue. All the other bricks of the authoritarian takeover are already basically in place.
The most dangerous man in my life is this president.
Okay I read until it started getting kooky, which is the election denial shit and defending Trump after the insurrection. I get it. He's an insincere nutcase.
But I would like to say that there are a lot of people who counterintuitively supported both Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders, and I think I can explain why. Both Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders clearly believe on a personal level that they are doing the right thing. It's rare to see politicians who don't give the impression of being slimebag liars.
Of course, their politics are completely incompatible with each other, but some people don't care about that. They just want a politician that they can trust to do what they said they're going to do.
But since he went on to support Trump, that reasoning all flies out the window. Maybe he was frequently dropped on his head as a child.
Also... post-truth politics is intolerable
No, they are not eating the cats. No, the vax doesn't make you magnetic. No, USA under Biden was not rounding people into camps.
I agree with you and would say the same thing to my Trump supporting colleagues about Bernie in particular, circa 2016:
"I get it you hate socialism, and Bernie is going to turn us into Venezuela or whatever, but do you really believe that is his intent? Or do you believe, as wrong as he may be, that he thinks he's doing the right thing and trying to help people."
Most would always agree, that although he is wrong and a communist fascist socialist dope, he is earnest.
But back to the paradoxical supporters of Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders, I think the genuineness is a big draw, but the politics are not completely incompatible.. they both agreed on one big thing in different ways... Ron Paul wanted to audit the Fed, Bernie wanted to tax billionaires. They both were going after the masters of the universe pockets.
I assume it’s about drawing votes away from the Democrats. I’m surprised more people don’t think or talk openly about doing this (for either side).
I mean... he doesn't sound that bad.
Ok, that's fine, but I am still going to praise him. This took courage to do.
Even if he's wrong about other things, he did the right thing here. How are we ever going to incentivize people to do the right thing if they are going to get shit for it either way?
There's a time and place to criticize him, but right now at this moment I'm more than happy to simply praise him.
Like with a toddler or a puppy that one is training. You give praise for the good decisions and they just might starting making other good decisions in order to get more praise.
I love how your instinct is to attack him "because he's a Republican" rather than "because of what he's said". This is the worst of political discussion these days. "Oh - he's a Democrat" and "He's a Republican" are used as arguments to dismiss rather than discussing the merits (or lack of) an argument.
I'm not defending this guy. He may be a piece of shit (I don't know). But your instinct is toxic.
They didn't attack him because he is a republican. They even showed reasons to back up why he shouldn't be given praise. So it seems like maybe your instincts are the issue here.
I would recommend spending some time comprehending what you read before responding.