this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
387 points (98.7% liked)

Not The Onion

20856 readers
1380 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“If you decide to go with your ego and not with your head, you are leaving behind dozens of wealthy people from all over the world who will know that** you performed market manipulation** and stole from them. They know who you are, you don’t know who they are. It took them less than 5 minutes to find out exactly where you live … how often you see your lovely parents … and exactly who your … brothers and sisters are.”

So the guy threatening the journalist to change his story so the gambler can make money isn't market manipulation, but the journalist not changing his story is....

What scary about this, and it was mentioned in the article, is how future stories by less than ethical "journalist" can be purchased so that one side can become rich. Fuck accuracy it's all about the money.

Well it's not like that is already the case with social media, but I would like to think there is at least some aspect of reporting that is based in ethics and truth.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 28 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Polymarket is one of many direct evidence of the impending fall of society.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 26 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

It's one of those things that would seem excessive in a story.

A place so decadent that everything was to bet for. Even as the world ended around them, they gambled on how.

[–] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

A place so decadent that everything was to bet for. Even as the world ended around them, they gambled on how.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

20 years ago, if you wrote a story about a dystopian future sci-fi setting that included polymarket, readers would interpret it as a heavy-handed metaphor for widespread cynicism and derealization

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 12 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

It's the real life version of the intro to Cyberpunk 2077, with the radio host talking about bets on the death toll in Night city.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Cyberpunk was supposed to by a dystopia, not a fucking instruction manual!

But seriously, I've lost about all enjoyment in cyber-dystopian stories because these days they cut depressingly close to home.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

yeah I've had so many story ideas just end up being too on-the-nose. and a few that are "if I put this idea out there, someone will use it and make things worse for people I don't know." I don't need that kind of karma.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Really seems like a future dystopian sci-fi, where the main character is going to bring the whole system down.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Who's the main character in this scenario, Johnny Barronhand?

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 20 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah, it is messed up and doesnt even cover the section where apparently another journalist the writer knows was bribed to try and coerce the flow of information to get that win. It basically confirms that there is already a willing lack of integrity somewhere to think it would work here.

A few hours later, a colleague from another media outlet messaged me. He said that someone he knew asked him to ask me to change the report on the missile impact in Beit Shemesh, and that it would be “negligible” for me if I did make the change.

Going further, the acquaintance even offered the journalist compensation, from his winnings, if he managed to convince me to change my report.