this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
692 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

9703 readers
823 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is that One-punch-man and Foot-sole-face-man?

[–] meejle@piefed.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's may be made with AI, but I'm not sure you can call it slop. It is an adaptation from an old anime, and people seem to very clearly understand the meaning/intention. Zl0UcgjZ4Rv8fcO.jpg

[–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

~~It doesn't even look like AI to me, looks like a very simple edit. ~~ I stand corrected

[–] pipe01@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look at them side by side, the faces are completely different

[–] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, you're right. AI slop it is.

[–] robert.meyer86@piefed.social -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] robert.meyer86@piefed.social 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That's pretty fucking vague. Would you care to elaborate. It seems someone made it for a very specific situation and it delivers the message well. It's not like it some fantasy photo of a cat with three heads. It is a meme that people use to communicate an idea.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It seems someone made it

That's where you're wrong, and why it's slop. No one made it, it was made by a computer program designed to plagiarize actual creators. It's not like there's AI slop and AI not-slop, it's just slop all the way down.

Just curious though, AI aside, why would a fantasy photo of a cat with three heads somehow be less intrinsically valuable than whatever-the-fuck stupid reaction meme we're currently taking about?

[–] robert.meyer86@piefed.social -1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh, I see where the disconnect is, you think all AI is inherently evil and useless, while I think it can have use and moral value. So no point in continuing this conversation since nothing I say will penetrate your anti AI bias.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture?

Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷‍♂️