this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
638 points (99.5% liked)
People Twitter
9690 readers
1388 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's where you're wrong, and why it's slop. No one made it, it was made by a computer program designed to plagiarize actual creators. It's not like there's AI slop and AI not-slop, it's just slop all the way down.
Just curious though, AI aside, why would a fantasy photo of a cat with three heads somehow be less intrinsically valuable than whatever-the-fuck stupid reaction meme we're currently taking about?
Oh, I see where the disconnect is, you think all AI is inherently evil and useless, while I think it can have use and moral value. So no point in continuing this conversation since nothing I say will penetrate your anti AI bias.
How do you know, you haven't even tried? And you didn't answer my other question which is unrelated to AI completely. How does a meme picture hold more value than a non-meme picture?
Tbf, I think AI could have a moral value, but in order to be worth it, that value has to outstrip all the bullshit that has come along with it. The moral value has to be more important than shareholder value, and that's simply never going to happen. 🤷♂️