this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
537 points (99.4% liked)
People Twitter
9690 readers
1681 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's may be made with AI, but I'm not sure you can call it slop. It is an adaptation from an old anime, and people seem to very clearly understand the meaning/intention.
~~It doesn't even look like AI to me, looks like a very simple edit. ~~ I stand corrected
Look at them side by side, the faces are completely different
Oh, you're right. AI slop it is.
What makes it slop exactly?
The nature of its creation.
That's pretty fucking vague. Would you care to elaborate. It seems someone made it for a very specific situation and it delivers the message well. It's not like it some fantasy photo of a cat with three heads. It is a meme that people use to communicate an idea.
That's where you're wrong, and why it's slop. No one made it, it was made by a computer program designed to plagiarize actual creators. It's not like there's AI slop and AI not-slop, it's just slop all the way down.
Just curious though, AI aside, why would a fantasy photo of a cat with three heads somehow be less intrinsically valuable than whatever-the-fuck stupid reaction meme we're currently taking about?