111
British tourist among 20 charged in Dubai over videos of Iranian missile strikes
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
111 points (99.1% liked)
World News
54706 readers
2413 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Man I fucking hate the Guardian.
Is there no source people can share that doesn't force you to accept cookies and subscribe?
firefox, reader mode
The full article still loads behind the banner
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/auto-reject-cookies/
This still won't let you read articles on websites like that though.
I'm using brave browser on mobile and i can read this article fine
What do you mean? I must be doing something right because I click the link and get no cookie popup and can read it. Is there a paywall I'm missing?
There are.
They'll all have heavy right wing bias though. Is that what you want?
Every single one that doesn't flood me with a "cookies or subscribe" banner has a right wing bias?
Pretty much yes.
Why?
Because all the big media conglomerates are pushing right wing agenda. They don't want/need your money that bad because they have the financial backing and those "news portals" are not a service, but a tool to spread propaganda.
On the other hand, true independent or left leaning publications don't have the same financial backing, thus rely on subscriptions, ads and seemingly anti-consumer approaches just to stay afloat.
Remember: if it's "free", you're the product.
PBS and Mother Jones both don't.
Yes they have a donate button, what they don't have is "turn off your adblocker or subscribe to keep reading this article"
Boh of them let you hit X on the donate and then keep reading.
I think your assessment is wrong.
PBS is a non-com non-profit.
Mother Jones literally runs a bi-monthly subscription magazine that funds their operations, aside from the ads on their website.
And both of them enjoy being in the US while The Guardian is a British publication, with more stringent requirements on financial steps, which is why they have to ask for permission to collect your information. Oh, and even then, their site manages to load a total of 3 trackers. Mother Jones is at 218 just loading the front page, both checked with domain level adblocking...
But hey, if you'd rather enjoy the mirage of not being datamined instead of being told upfront and offered to not be datamined for a little money... that's on you buddy. But I doubt that unicorn will show up on your next birthday...
Ok, so there are left leaning options that don't require you to turn off adblocker or subscribe to read the article.
Even on those sites I mentioned you can still decline the cookies and read the whole article.
or just use ublock and noscript? I was able to view the article without any of that. Not even sure how you use the internet without them but you do you.
I have ublock but not noscript
You said you're able to view the article without either one? What browser do you use?
Looks like it does in fact work on desktop but I still have trouble getting it to on mobile. I'll experiment around with it
I said (or thought I implied) I use both and I use Firefox.
Oh yeah you did I misread that my bad I was like "WHAT HOW"