this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
98 points (100.0% liked)

news

24667 readers
638 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of a Khorramshahr-4 medium range ballistic missile, which has a range of about 2000km.


As I said in the last megathread, trying to figure out what exactly is happening is becoming ever more difficult. The gist of things is that Iran has, very justifiably, refused to negotiate (assassinating their leader and striking their country with hundreds of missiles in the middle of negotiations causes some reluctance to return to the table, I suppose). Censorship across the Middle East has further ramped up, with reportedly extreme punishments for posting footage of Iranian strikes online. From what I can gather, Iran's number of strikes have stabilized at a comfortable daily rate, with strikes into both the Gulf monarchies and Occupied Palestine continuing apace. Official charts of these strikes over time seem very disconnected from reality on the ground, but again, it's hard to really get at the specifics.

The messaging on how long the war is expected to last is rather muddled on both sides. The Trump administration fluctuates more than daily - and even sometimes in the same speech - on whether the war is already won or whether it's going to last months longer. The US seems to be coming up a new possible scheme every few hours: a ground invasion with the Kurds? A ground invasion without the Kurds? An amphibious assault? A series of commando operations to steal Iranian uranium? A massive parachuting operation into Tehran? Fuck it, let's just send the Navy into the Strait of Hormuz? There doesn't seem to be a coherent plan for continuing hostilities beyond firing more and more of a limited stockpile of cruise missiles into mostly non-military targets, hitting easily replaceable drone and missile launchers with a limited stockpile of drones, and burning a limited stockpile of interceptors at an astounding rate (and, in the process, disarming every other Western-aligned country of their interceptors).

Meanwhile, from Iran, I've seen rumors and reports from classic anonymous "senior IRGC officials" (no doubt some invented by Zionists to sow confusion), that I don't know how to substantiate, ranging anywhere from "If the US pulls back their forces now, we will restart negotiations," to "It doesn't matter what the US or the Zionists do or say, we aren't stopping until every last trace of Zionism in the Middle East has been extinguished," to a few positions in between those poles. Despite the damage to infrastructure in Iran, it doesn't seem like there has been any political or social fracturing. Not to speak too soon - perhaps the West will start earnestly trying to overfly Iranian territory to drop their very plentiful bombs soon - but every indication is that there will be no regime change nor societal collapse in Iran in the short and medium term.

The US is desperately trying - and mostly failing - to keep a lid on the economic firestorm they have ignited. There has been much ado about oil prices and oil futures and indexes and what all the myriad Lines going up and down signify and things like that, which is befitting such a financialized empire which is so disconnected from the actual physical flows of materials and much more attuned to vibes and speeches. The only thing I'm personally paying much attention to on the economic front is the drones and missiles slamming into fossil fuel infrastructure, the Hormuz blockade, and the resulting global shockwave of shortages, stoppages, closures, bankruptcies, and force majeures spreading out from the epicenter that is Iran.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 36 points 2 days ago (4 children)

NASA clears Artemis moon rocket for an April launch with four astronauts after repairs

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-13/nasa-clears-its-artemis-moon-rocket-for-an-april-launch/106450032

A S S

article text

NASA clears Artemis moon rocket for an April launch with four astronauts after repairs Topic:Space

2h ago 2 hours ago The rock sits on the launch pad, attached to a huge metal scaffold apparatus. NASA's Artemis II SLS moon rocket with the Orion spacecraft in Cape Canaveral, Florida. (AP: John Raoux)

In short: A launch window of early April has been set for the Artemis II launch, with NASA saying astronauts could blast off as early as April 1.

The launch will mark humanity's first trip to the moon in more than 50 years and pave the way for future lunar exploration.

What's next: If NASA does not launch within the six day window, the mission will be delayed until late April or early May.

Link copied

Share NASA has cleared its moon rocket for an April launch with four astronauts after completing the latest round of repairs.

The 98-metre rocket will roll out of the hangar and back to the pad next week at Florida's Kennedy Space Center, leading to a launch attempt as early as April 1.

It will mark humanity's first trip to the moon in more than 50 years.

Artemis 2 is attached to a now lit launch apparatus, and stands next to the NASA hanger. The sky is a deep purple colour behind. Artemis II has been cleared for a launch attempt as early as April 1. (AP: John Raoux)

The Artemis II crew should have blasted off on a lunar fly around earlier this year, but fuel leaks and other problems with the Space Launch System rocket interfered.

Although NASA managed to plug the hydrogen fuel leaks at the pad in February, a helium-flow issue forced the space agency to return the rocket to the Vehicle Assembly Building for repairs, bumping the mission to April.

The space agency has only six days at the beginning of April to launch, otherwise it will have to stand down until a new window between April 30 and early May.

NASA 'playing Russian roulette' with astronauts' lives, ex-engineer says The orion spacecraft, with the moon, and Earth in the background. After years of delays, NASA's Artemis II mission is aiming to launch next month. But issues with the heat shield are causing some people to raise the alarm.

"It's a test flight and it is not without risk, but our team and our hardware are ready," Lori Glaze, NASA's Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate associate administrator, said .

Dr Glaze and other NASA officials declined to provide the risk probabilities for the upcoming mission.

John Honeycutt, chair of the mission management team, said history had shown that a new rocket had essentially a 50 per cent chance of success.

"There's so much gap since the only other SLS flight — more than three years ago without anyone on board — that it's difficult to understand any risk assessment numbers," Mr Honeycutt said. "It's not the first flight," Dr Glaze said.

"But we're also not in a regular cadence. So we definitely have significantly more risk than a flight system that's flying all the time."

Late last month, NASA's new administrator, Jared Isaacman, announced a major overhaul of the Artemis program to speed things up and, by doing so, reduce risk.

Dissatisfied with the slow pace and lengthy gaps between lunar missions, he added an extra practice flight in orbit around Earth for next year.

That is now the new Artemis III, with the moon landing by two astronauts shifted to Artemis IV.

Mr Isaacman is targeting one and maybe even two lunar landings in 2028.

NASA's Office of Inspector General warned in an audit this week that the space agency needs to come up with a rescue plan for its lunar crews.

A sign saying artemis and a rocket behind. Fuel leaks and other problems with the Space Launch System rocket have interfered with the luanch date. (AP: John Raoux)

Landing near the moon's south pole will be riskier than it was for the Apollo astronauts closer to the equator given, the rough polar terrain, according to the report.

The report cited the lunar landers as the top contributor for potential loss of crew during the first few Artemis moon landings. It listed the space agency's loss-of-crew threshold at one-in-40 for lunar operations and one-in-30 for Artemis missions overall.

Contracted by NASA to provide the moon landers for astronauts, Elon Musk's SpaceX and Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin have accelerated work in order to meet the new 2028 target date.

The inside story of the Challenger disaster A forked white cloud against a dark blue sky, with a fiery orange ball at the join of the fork. Forty years ago, the Challenger space shuttle disintegrated just after lift-off. A small team of engineers tried to prevent the tragedy.

The inspector general's office said many technical challenges remained, including refuelling their landers in orbit around Earth before flying to the moon.

NASA sent 24 astronauts to the moon during Apollo, 12 of whom landed on it. All but one of the moonshots — Apollo 13 — achieved their prime objectives.

The program ended with Apollo 17 in 1972.

Posted 2h ago2 hours ago Promotion David Speers and 'ABC National Forum' title with the ABC iview logo. Text reads: Big Ideas, Crucial Conversations — Stream Now. Related stories NASA revamps Artemis Moon landing program Topic:Space Exploration

A rocket stands tall in the distance. A sign to the left of the picture, in the foreground, reads Artemis. NASA boss blasts Boeing and space agency for botched Starliner flight Topic:Spacecraft

A spacecraft is blasting off from a launchpad with loads of smoke underneath 'Dying' satellite leaves Australia's north waiting hours for latest fire information Topic:Fires

A render of a cuboid gold-plated satellite with a large solar panel array in space, orbiting the Earth. Related topics Space

Space Exploration

Spacecraft

United States


[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It will mark humanity's first trip to the moon in more than 50 years.

What no communism does to humanities scientific progress.

Dr Glaze

Hahahaha no way that's her name?

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

*her name

part-of-history makes you feel part of history that a woman could recreate the challenger explosion

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The space race was a proxy war to demonstrate ICBM capabilities. I guess that the Soviets wouldn’t have bothered going through half the trouble otherwise.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think this is the first time I've seen an article where the AI writing makes it downright incomprehensible. I feel less informed than I did before I read this, just irrelevant tangential information overload.

So there is a launch in April, next month but it is a test flight, and isn't going to the moon, and the article just contradicts itself, because the actually planned lunar flights are for 2028.

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago

I'm a bit blob-no-thoughts when it comes to spave stuff but on a reread I'm like, wait, yeah, this is disparate quotes patchworked into the semblance of an article

There are some funny quotes though:

Late last month, NASA's new administrator, Jared Isaacman, announced a major overhaul of the Artemis program to speed things up and, by doing so, reduce risk.

More haste, more speed, as they say.

The report cited the lunar landers as the top contributor for potential loss of crew during the first few Artemis moon landings

'Lunar lander involved crew loss incident' what, did you leave them at the shops when you drove home? Imagine training a decade as an astranought only for your death to be being management speak-en out of existence like a oranges that went bad in transit

[–] miz@hexbear.net 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

uhhh, just wondering, but is it possible to take out life insurance on people you don't know?

[–] RuthBaderGonesburg@hexbear.net 21 points 2 days ago

Is there a polymarket for whether these astronauts return to earth or not?

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I will wager this new launch will be postponed

[–] someone@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

And even then, there's another possible problem. The first uncrewed test flight and landing showed a problem with the Orion crew capsule heat shield. Actually fixing the problem and testing the solution would have meant another year-plus delay, because the Artemis II heat shield was already manufactured by the time the Artemis I test showed the problem. So naturally NASA management has decided to just change the reentry trajectory of the capsule to hopefully change the heating pattern and reduce the issue.

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] miz@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

mistakenly hit by a THAAD interceptor

But with it be via friendly fire or Havana syndrome?

[–] supafuzz@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

They're going to "accidentally" launch it at Tehran