this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
115 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

15211 readers
523 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Are they though? Still way behind European cities.

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

European city's were designed when everyone was on foot or maybe a horse, everything had to be walkable, even penthouses weren't a thing because there were only stairs.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

A lot of european cities got destroyed during WW2 and were rebuild to be more car friendly.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

This is a bit of a myth. Many (most?) American cities were designed before the car too. But urban planners in the 20th century went all in on cars and racism and demolished their central cities to to evict all the undesirables and replace them with car infrastructure.

Actually some European cities did this too, but many repaired them later. Still, it wasn't as common because the racial stuff wasn't in play and the central cities had way more historical significance.

Admittedly the sheer amount of suburban development we have today is going to be a challenge to roll back. In my view some of it may ultimately need to be abandoned but we'll see how it plays out. See Detroit for an example.

[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago

Which European cities? Amsterdam? Then sure. Rome? I think Cambridge wins.

Boston (and by extension Cambridge) is already very European-like for layout and walkability.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

In this case I doubt it