this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
50 points (93.1% liked)
Canada
11707 readers
420 users here now
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
- Anmore (BC)
- Burnaby (BC)
- Calgary (AB)
- Comox Valley (BC)
- Edmonton (AB)
- East Gwillimbury (ON)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kingston (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Niagara Falls (ON)
- Niagara-on-the-Lake (ON)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Sarnia (ON)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Squamish (BC)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Whistler (BC)
- Windsor (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- Montréal Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
💻 Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- Buy Canadian
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Canadian Skincare
- Churning Canada
- Quebec Finance
- Canada Grown Business
🗣️ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
🍁 Social / Culture
- Ask a Canadian
- Bières Québec
- Canada Francais
- Canadian Gaming
- EhVideos (Canadian video media)
- First Nations
- First Nations Languages
- Indigenous
- Inuit
- Logiciels libres au Québec
- Maple Music (music)
Rules
- Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sure, if everybody started dumping US assets in a coordinated fashion that would hurt the US, we both know is not going to happen though. So, in reality Canada is simply making itself more dependent on the US. There's no need to do mental gymnastics to pretend that this is some 4D chess.
And doing so in a relatively carefully manner so as not to hurt ourselves unnecessarily.
Making ourselves more dependent on a hostile power is precisely what's hurting us unnecessarily. Incredible that people can't seem to understand this.
So what's your point here?
IIT you are both arguing it's bad Canada held onto these investments while saying Canada cannot actually dump them without hurting itself
No, I'm saying Canada should not have continued increasing investments, which is what we did, and we should have been dumping them instead. And the sooner we start doing that the less pain we will be in long term. Let me know if any of that is still unclear to you.
Hmmm looks like Canada has increased that investment for the last 4-5 years. Without this year's report, it's hard to see if we still kept that 4-5 year old strategy going or not.
Keep in mind that, until the Orange Pedophile's second term (so early last year), Canada was only paying lip service to moving away from the USA
that's literally explained in the reply to the comment you screenshotted
yes, and you seemed to be arguing AGAINST that poster... hence my question
Also, letting bonds expire is not selling them so again, you are talking both ends here
You seem to be utterly unable to actually engage with what's being said. Go read my reply to that comment. I'm not challenging that the bonds can be redeemed. Why don't you actually address what I said instead of accusing me of talking of both ends here?
I posted a screenshot of what you said... and now you want me to find another of your post that contradicts it... that is exactly what I am pointing out here.
If you don't want to be called out, maybe be a bit clearer?
Once again, I ask you to specifically explain what part what my argument you disagree with. I've already addressed the screenshot you posted. You completely ignored the rest of what I said. And I strongly suspect that you either don't understand what I wrote, or you're intentionally trolling here. Which is it?
You actually did not, you pointed me to someone ELSE who corrected you.. but whatever, it seemed very clear you just got defensive and started insulting people, not interested in your opinion anymore.
Have a nice day
I've given you detailed explanations, and you simply ignored them. I asked you to point out what you disagreed with specifically, and you started dancing around that. Sounds like the answer to my question is that you are just trolling here, and you're not interested in having a good faith discussion.
Bye.
I don't pretend to know anything about international finance. I'm repeating what I've heard.
It's also worth thinking about what you hear as well. People say all kinds of things, and a lot of time it's just nonsense. As I pointed out, if holding US debt gave any actual leverage, then China would be doing that instead of selling it off now.