this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
302 points (96.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21168 readers
1966 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 107 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Trump is about to find out that ship owners won’t risk hundreds of millions per ship on an uninsurable voyage just to stroke his ego.

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 60 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's not even just the price of a ship and cargo. Lead times are around 2.8 to 3 yrs for crude tankers and around 3.5 yrs for LNG carriers. That's a long time to not be able to conduct business even if insurance did pay out. It is 100% rational to sit out a few weeks to figure out how to resume operations safely rather than trying to sneak through and hope for the best.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, especially since they have promised its only going to be 3 weeks. It's almost as if that was a lie.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Every war ever fought was going to be over in a couple of weeks with an overwhelming victory.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Well, at least Trump is well known for paying his debts.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

Oddly, due to maritime law, it's the cargo owners who would have to pay if the ship was only damaged but not sunk.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Alternatively wasn't he floating some kind of mandatory insurance scheme? mandatory in the sense that the insurer can't refuse. Sounds like a great time to liquidate some ageing stock for yhuge profits.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No. Reinsurance "scheme" lets an insurer transfer all risk. If US government is willing to pay the insurer $100M, then they will charge the ship $99M for the voyage. But the ship is not obligated to pay $99M instead of staying where they are. Brian Kilmede will not volunteer to be crew on the ships no matter the pay, either.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Should've involuntarily added him to the crew of that genius "submarine". Missed our chance.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh it is insurable all right. You just have to pay what is called the "war premium". I bet they wouldn't like what comes through the strait anyway.